Tag: Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi’s Dark Hyperstition

During writing my last post on hyperstition I had a flash of an idea that Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi is a massive example of hyperstition, if 4chan could have memed Trump into the Oval Office, this man memed the European Union 🇪🇺 into reality. He established the Paneuropean Union already in 1923. His work, the Practical Idealism (beyond the link is 2024, official Paneuropa translation) is a much more interesting set of ideas that gave rise to conspiracy theories of the far right and antisemitic nature. This is what Google AI tells me about it:

Kalergi plan is an antisemitic and far right conspiracy theory that claims that there exists a secret intention to destroy the European white population through controlled mass immigration.

Nasty shit 💩 You get me, totally radioactive ☢️

According to historians Roland Clark and Nikolaus Hagen, the conspiracy theory of the ‘Kalergi Plan’ originated in Nazi Germany. In November 1940, the Nazi Party newspaper, the ‘Völkischer Beobachter’, accused Kalergi of dreaming of creating a world of Eurasian-Negroid people, which would be ruled by the Jews. Clark and Nikolaus point out that the newspaper’s claims were a mixture of misinterpretation and fabrication of Kalergi’s work. Another Nazi newspaper accused him of having links with Jews and the Freemasons. Notably, Kalergi himself was not of Jewish descent, although he actively opposed anti-Semitism. Kalergi fled Austria in 1938. He lived in the US until 1945 and returned to Austria only after the war.

Source

On the other hand, West European cities today have a large population of foreigners, even Prague is 25% foreign today. And obviously this isn’t the result of a plan proposed by Kalergi but rather the result of colonialism, neocolonialism, globalization, and capitalism. For the former there is no tangible evidence but the masses like to attribute reality going to shit to single source. Kalergi, himself a son of an Austrian noble and a Japanese woman was attuned to these processes already back then. The examination of the text is however an interesting endeavor:

Man of the distant future will be a hybrid. Today’s races and castes will fall victim to the growing defeat of space, time and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, outwardly similar to the ancient Egyptian, will replace the diversity of races with a diversity of individuals.

-pp.30

Kalergi had more to say about the Jews, he dedicated a whole chapter to them:

The primary supports of both the corrupt and the upright intellectual nobility — of capitalism, journalism and the literary profession — are Jews. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to be a major factor in the future nobility.

A look at the history of the Jewish people explains their lead in the struggle for leadership of mankind. Two millennia ago, the Jews were a religious community composed of ethically and religiously inclined individuals from all nations of the ancient cultural world, with a national-Hebraic centre in Palestine. At that time, what was common, unifying and primary was not the nation, but religion. In the course of the first millennium of our era, proselytes from all peoples entered this religious community, most recently the king, nobility and people of the Mongolian Khazars, the lords of southern Russia. Only from then on did the Jewish religious community form an artificial national community and isolate itself from all other peoples.

For a thousand years, Christian Europe has been trying to eradicate the Jewish people through unspeakable persecutions. The result was that all Jews who were weak-willed, unscrupulous, opportunistic, or sceptical were baptised, thereby escaping the torments of endless persecution. On the other hand, all Jews who were not skilful, clever and inventive enough to survive the struggle for existence in this most difficult form perished underthese often difficult living conditions.

So finally a small community emerged from all these persecutions, tempered by a heroically endured martyrdom for the idea and purified of all weak-willed and weak-minded elements. Instead of destroying the Jews, Europe reluctantly refined them through this artificial process of selection and educated them into a leading nation of the future. No wonder, then, that this people, who emerged from the prison of the ghetto, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, as the feudal nobility fell into decline, a benevolent providence bestowed upon Europe, through the emancipation of the Jews, a new noble race of spiritual grace.

The first typical representative of this emerging future nobility was the revolutionary noble Jew Lassalle, who combined beauty of the body with gallantry of character and sharpness of mind to a high degree: an aristocrat in the highest and truest sense of the word, he was a born leader and guide of his time.

Jews are not the new nobility; rather, Jewry is the womb from which a new, spiritual nobility of Europe will emerge; the core around which a new spiritual nobility is grouped. An intellectual urban master race is forming: idealists, witty and sensitive, just and true to its convictions, brave like the feudal nobility in its best days, who gladly accept death and persecution, hatred and contempt, in order to make mankind more moral, spiritual, and happier.

The Jewish heroes and martyrs of the Eastern and Central European revolution are in no way inferior to the non-Jewish heroes of the World War in terms of courage, perseverance and idealism — while they often surpass them in spirit. The nature of these men and women who seek to redeem and regenerate humanity is a peculiar synthesis of religious and political elements: of heroic martyrdom and spiritual propaganda, revolutionary energy and social love, of justice and compassion. These traits, which once made them the creators of the Christian world movement, now place them at the forefront of the socialist movement.

With these two attempts at salvation of spiritual and moral origin, the Jews bestowed the disinherited masses of Europe more richly than any other people. How then modern Jewry surpasses all other peoples in its percentage of important men: scarcely a century after its liberation, this small people today stands with Einstein at the forefront of modern science; with Mahler at the forefront of modern music; with Bergson at the forefront of modern philosophy; with Trotsky at the forefront of modern politics. The prominent position that Jews hold today is due solely to their, intellectual superiority which enables them to triumph over an enormous superiority of privileged, hateful, envious rivals in intellectual competition.

Modern antisemitism is one of the many manifestations of reaction of the mediocre against the excellent; it is a modern form of, ostracism used against an entire people. As a people, Jews experience the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against superior individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities.

The main roots of antisemitism are narrow-mindedness envy and : narrow-mindedness in the religious or in the scientific; envy in the intellectual or in the economic.

Having emerged from an international religious community, not from a local race, the Jews are the people of the strongest interbreeding; because they have been shutting themselves off from the other peoples for a thousand years, they are the people of the strongest inbreeding. Thus, as with the high nobility, the chosen among them combine strength of will with sharpness of mind, while another part of the Jews combines the defects of inbreeding with the defects of interbreeding: lack of character with narrow-mindedness. Here we find the most sacred self-sacrifice alongside the most restricted selfishness, the purest idealism alongside the most crass materialism. Here, too, the rule is confirmed: the more mixed a people, the more dissimilar its representatives are among one another, and the more impossible it is to construct a unified type.

Where there is much light, there is much shadow. Brilliant families have a higher percentage of the insane and criminals than mediocre ones; this also applies to peoples. Not only tomorrow’s revolutionary spiritual aristocracy — today’s plutocratic profiteer kakistocracy is recruited primarily from among the Jews: and thus sharpens the agitational weapons of antisemitism.

A thousand years of slavery have, with rare exceptions, stripped the Jews of the gestures of the master man. Permanent oppression inhibits personal development and thus takes away a main element of the aesthetic ideal of nobility. A large segment of the Jews suffer from this deficiency, both physically and psychologically; this deficiency is the main reason why the European instinct resists recognising Jews as a noble race.

The resentment with which oppression has burdened the Jews gives them much vital tension; it takes away from them a lot of elegant harmony. Exaggerated inbreeding, combined with the hyper-urbanity of the ghetto-past, had many traits of physical and psychological decadence as a result. What the Jews’ minds gained, their bodies often lost; what their brains gained, their nervous systems lost.

Thus, Jews suffer from a hypertrophy of the brain and so stand in contrast to the aristocratic demand for harmonious personal development. The physical and nervous weakness of many spiritually excellent Jews results in a lack of physical courage (often combined with supreme moral courage) and an insecurity of demeanour: qualities that still seem incompatible with the chivalrous ideal of the nobleman today.

Thus the spiritual master race of the Jews has to suffer from the traits of slaves which their historical development has stamped on them: even today, many Jewish leaders bear the attitude and gesture of the unfree, oppressed man. In their gestures, degraded aristocrats are often more noble than outstanding Jews.

These shortcomings of the Jews, which have arisen through development, will disappear again through development. The ruralisation of Jewry (a major goal of Zionism), combined with physical education, will liberate Jews from the ghetto remnants it still carries today. The development of American Jewry shows that this is possible. The actual freedom and power that Jews have achieved will be followed by the consciousness of those things, and the consciousness will gradually be followed by the attitude and gesture of a free and powerful people.

Not only will Jews change in the direction of the Western ideal of nobility — the Western ideal of nobility will also undergo a change that will meet Jews halfway. In a more peaceful Europe of the future, the nobility will shed their warlike character and exchange it for a spiritual and priestly character. A pacified and socialised Occident will no longer need masters and rulers — only leaders, educators, and role models. In an oriental Europe, the future aristocrat will resemble a Brahmin and Mandarin more than a knight. 

And Kalergi adds:

The noble man of the future will be neither feudal nor Jewish, neither bourgeois nor proletarian: he will be synthetic. Races and classes as we understand them today will disappear, individuals will remain.

pps. 55-61

So, from this the Nazi propagandists have conjectured that the Paneuropeans have the goal to misgendate the white race out of existence and this new uni-race will be ruled by the Jews.😆👌 What Kalergi is actually saying is that in the future mixed race Europe, the Jews will play a major role. But at the end he said that eventually there will not be any Jews. Kalergi’s family was very philosemitic, his father wrote a book on antisemitism, and both Richard and his brother Hans married Jewish women.

Oh common Nazis, Niggaz in Paris are burning down shops now…

The Kalergi plan is actually a hyperstition in that Kalergi envisaged a process in which the Europeans transform racially. Mass immigration however is not a single plan. A large contributing factor to this was decolonization and WWII. It would have probably happened had the WWII never occurred, the latter event only sped up the process.

Multicultural mode for you goyim!

The Europeans would eventually lose their colonies and the colonials, non-whites that served the European imperialists were expelled by their nationalist governments. Further, people from the colonies were invited to rebuild Europe. The capitalist loves mass immigration, just look at H1B visas in the US. Capitalists want to import workforce to undercut domestic work. Further, the EU and probably the US, maintains unequal trade relationship with the Global South. This keeps the latter poor, and has triggered waves of migration from the Global South to the EU, US and Canada. This is supported by activists and leftist parties in Europe that believe they are importing voters. Although lately, I see the pro-capitalist parties of the center-right attracting a lot of especially economically successful immigrants. So the process Kalergi described in mid 1920s is happening but there are so many processes in play that it can hardly be called a conspiracy imagined by one man.

I literally saw this on my screen just when I finished the last paragraph…

Of course Jews are very prominent in this process, BlackRock loves Indians on H1B visas, advertising companies, the music industry promote mixed couples. Yes I am suggesting Jews are very prominent in those. Even interracial pornography is produced by Jewish individuals. How big of an effect this has on miscegenation is questionable. But a lot of woke corporate propaganda are the companies trying to gaslight the population into accepting niggaz and faggodz. I don’t know what this is supposed to achieve. Maybe this is some psychological voodoo that I am not aware of. Obviously there is a resistance to this process, integration of third world dregs is hard, and woke goes broke so even BlackRock is not happy.

How the Union Leads to Ruin in Ukraine

The Uniate Church and the Ruin are two concepts from Little Russian history that inform the Ukrainian reality of today…

From the olden days, the Holy See in Rome sought to conquer the Holy Rus’. Alexander Nevsky had to repel an invasion of the Teutonic Knights but there was a much more fearsome foe than the knights, the Rzeczpospolita, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Both constitutive realms of this empire began expanding their domains into Rus’ already in the fourteenth century with the seizure of Halychyna by the Kingdom of Poland. Coincidently, a gene test my brother did shows we are descended from the Lithuanians that conquered Rus’ and there is family legend about a “Polish” ancestry on my Russian side.

There was a difference in faith, while the Westerners answered to the Pope, Rus’ answered to the Eastern Churches and eventually, Moscow became free of Constantinople following the Ottoman conquest, and the only rightful spiritual authority in Rus’. Fearing this Muscovite influence, the Polish masters of Ukraine decided to bring the Orthodox Churches under Roman Catholic control. In 1595 at the Union of Brest, the bishops of Little and White Russia under Rzeczpospolita accepted Roman domination. Several decades have passed and a rebellion erupted in Little Russia, which saw the Cossacks swear fealty to the Russian Tsar. This has plunged Ukraine into a destructive period known as the Ruin, which resolved itself really only in the eighteenth century with the Russian Empire coming to dominate the entirety of Little Russia, and the neutralisation of the Rzeczpospolita.

But unfortunately, the Russian Empire failed to take Halychyna in the division of Poland. Halychyna, or Galicia as it is also known, is a part of Rus. West of Lvov, there lies a town called Rava Rus’ka, that’s where Rus’ begins and it goes all the way to Vladivostok. Halychyna fell under the Austrian rule, and the Uniate Church survived there. This later served as the nucleus out of which will rise Ukrainian nationalism. Starting in the second half of the nineteenth century, the Austria-Hungary, as the Habsburg realms came to be known, entered into alliance with the German Empire, the Russian Empire joined France in an Entente. The Habsburgs became enemies of Russia.

Maxim Sandovych

Austria was faced with a problem of Russians on its territory. The Austrians viewed so called Russophillism of many of the inhabitants of Halychyna with suspicion. Thousands of people from Halychyna made annual pilgrimage to the Pochayevskaya Lavra, an Orthodox monastery right across the border from Austrian Halychyna in the Russian Empire. The Austrian authorities began repressing the local Russophiles. Maxim Sandovych, an Orthodox covert from the Uniate Church was tortured to death by the Austrian authorities prior to the First World War. After the Russian defeat by the Central Powers in 1915, the Austrians have interned the Russian population in concentration camps in Terezín in Bohemia, and in Thalerhof in Styria. Wikipedia has this to say about Thalerhof:

The Austro-Hungarian authorities imprisoned leaders of the Russophilism movement among the Carpatho-Rusyns, Lemkos, and Galicians; those who recognized the Russian language as the literary standard form of their own Slavic dialects and had sympathy for the Russian Empire. Thus, the captives were forced to abandon their identity as Russians and obtain a Ukrainian identity. Captives who identified themselves as Ukrainians were freed from the camp.

Terezín became the site of a genocide again during WWII, when the Jews were interned there.

Simultaneously with the repression, the Austrians have supported a development of a Ukrainian identity that would be different from Russian. Remember dear readers, national identities are always imposed from above and people can always be reprogrammed. Polish nobility long toyed with the Ukrainian idea. According to Mikhail Onufrienko, a blogger from Kharkov that now lives in Crimea in exile, the idea to rename the South Western part of Rus’ into Ukraine originated already in the sixteenth century with the Jesuit envoy, Antonio Possevino. Part of the reason the Polish rebellions against Russian rule of the nineteenth century failed was because the Russian peasants didn’t go along with their Polish masters. Many of these Poles and early adepts of the Ukrainian national idea fled to Austrian Halychyna, where they continued their work with Austrian support.

A good example of the Austrian support for Ukrainian nationalism is Mikhailo Hrushevsky, who was given a cushy job of a professor in Lvov and a hefty grant to write Ukrainian history, a historical conception that removes Ukraine from the common Russian history. If you were to write the true history of Ukraine, you would have to start with Nikolay Kostomarov, Ivan Franko, the afore mentioned Hrushevsky, and not somewhere deep in the past, like in the Cossack period. The Cossacks referred to themselves as Russians. I would not even speak much about Shevchenko, who also identified as Russian. But Hrushevsky did just that, relabelled them all as Ukrainians. I call the conception that Ukraine emerged out of Ukrainian nationalism, which was heavily supported by the enemies of Russia, “a short history of Ukraine.”

By the First World War, there was a sizeable community of newly created Ukrainians in Halychyna. The first time the nationality “Ukrainian” appeared officially was in 1916, when the future Emperor Charles I inspected the troops in Halychyna, and declared everyone in the camp to be Ukrainian. After the revolution in Russia, the Communists, who were opposed to Russian nationalism made the decision to break down the Russian nation by employing the Austrian project, and began a programme of mass creating the Ukrainians. For this purpose, they brought many teachers from Halychyna, including the aforementioned Mikhailo Hrushevsky. Russia’s Ukrainian headache is a bolshevik legacy.

Early Ukrainian nationalism was very much centred around the Uniate Church, the Austrians viewed the papists as loyal citizens. Ukrainism was therefore an extension of the previous Union, the Union of Brest. In more recent times an idea of a united Europe appeared, and since the 1990s, the European Union is bringing these ideas into reality. But parallel with the European Union that we all know from the European Parliament, and the European Commission, there is also a spiritual union and the ideological founder of European integration, the Pan-European Union.

The importance of union with Rome has slightly diminished in recent times with the decline of Catholicism and religiosity in the West, and the centre of control gravitated eventually to Brussels. However, there is a lot of “Habsburg” influence on the symbolic basis of the EU. You see, the Pan-European Union has given the European Union all of its symbols. The circle of twelve stars:

The twelve stars symbolise the twelve signs of the Zodiac, and the number 12 stands for completion and perfection. Note the Cross, as if indicating an inheritance from the Roman Catholic project. The secular EU, and the European Council of course do not have the cross in their flag. Furthermore, the anthem of the European Union, the Ode to Joy, was adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in the 1970s on the suggestion made in 1955 by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, a son of a Bohemian Nobleman and an upperclass Japanese gaijin chaser, the founder and the first head of the Pan-European Union. Now check out the Ode to Joy on the Euromaidan, they even created new updated lyrics for it in Ukrainian. After Coudenhove-Kalergi, the head of the Pan-European Union was Otto von Habsburg.

Petr Fiala, the current head of the Czech Civic Democrats with Berndt Posselt, the current leader of the Sudetendeutsche Landsmanschaft, and Otto von Habsburg at a Pan-European meeting in Moravia. Habsburgofilia is strong for some reason in the Czech Lands.

It seems like the Austrian nobility found itself a new tool of domination. They have switched Catholicism for European integration. Ukraine suffers a new period of strife currently, Ruin 2.0, caused by a desire for another Union, as expressed in the Cargo Cult festival, the Euromaidan. Ukrainians seem again victims of some Austrian voodoo. And the EU is not even able to make Ukraine a candidate for membership.

Don’t be a cuck, don’t fall under the spell of an Austrian voodoo. Although, I have to say many adepts of Ukrainism are also adepts of another Austrian voodoo, created by the arch-opponent of Coudenhove-Kalergi.