What an article have a I found…

Basically guys, modern women cannot handle being with men that value themselves.

“I’m kind of ashamed,” the 23-year-old university student [Kenzie Sproat] said. “I totally just listened to him, and then at the end, I was like, ‘What am I doing? I don’t know what I’m doing.'” 

She first got involved in the long-distance relationship with an American military man a few years ago. She said the red flags began popping up six months in, when he began shaming her over her appearance, blowing up her phone if she didn’t respond to his texts and expressing jealousy over her friendships with other men.

Honestly, shaming your bitch over looks unless she is fat ain’t productive. And even then, you chose the bitch, or she chose you and you said yes, and if you don’t like how she looks find another. If a bitch flakes on you, don’t stress about it, bitches are like this.

However, if she has many male friends, that is a problem. In Czech we have this saying “Kamarád taky rád.” This means that the “friend also like“. He also likes some punani. These male friends are likely in the friend zone, they are potentially your replacement. Also a gay friend likes punani even though he prefers man’s butt. The gay friend is often her confidant, she tells him shit she doesn’t tell you, and she might be badmouthing your ass to him. Do you want this? There are Chads out there that keep a harem of women that are chasing after them, and boy the women are complaining about not being exclusive.

I don’t say Kenzie’s ex wasn’t an asshole in many respects but I would not call demand to keep contact with other men controlling. There should be some agreement between the partners and commitment to the relationship. I guess I am an idealist.

She thinks the online content he consumed —  including Joe Rogan podcasts — weren’t a good influence, while “manosphere” creators like Andrew Tate may have shaped his outlook.

If there wasn’t a problem in modern relationships, Andrew Tate would never have been a thing.

“He would make jokes about how many good points Andrew Tate has,” she said, referring to the kickboxer turned controversial social media influencer, who describes himself as a misogynist.

Did Andrew Tate ever define himself as a misogynist or are his words taken out of context?

Family lawyer Scott Byers, who’s based in Swift Current, Sask., said he and his colleagues have started seeing some of the factors Sproat described becoming a reason for divorce.

It started with the pandemic and couples having diverging views on things like vaccinations, but that’s shifted more recently, Byers said.

Like honestly, if a man didn’t want to get vaccinated, the wife should respect his choice.

“As the years have passed since the pandemic, I’m certainly seeing more clients come in telling me, ‘My spouse isn’t the person that I knew when [we] met. He puts his ear buds in and he’s listening to these podcasts and a lot of thinkers associated with the so-called manosphere.'” 

Byers said he believes online misogyny feeds a culture of coercion and abuse.

“It’s a new and unsettling dynamic.”

Manosphere teaches men not to be doormats, and to have expectations from women. Modern women consider this coercion and abuse.

He said one woman he represented told him that her husband had been injured on the job and, unable to work, started spending more time online and consuming what Byers described as “radical ideas” about gender.

Wanna bet she left him because he lost his job?

“He started to express views about how their children should be raised that my client just couldn’t accept,” he said.

We are not told the whole story here.

Byers said these men often want to represent themselves during divorce proceedings, animated by a perception that the family court system is biased against husbands and fathers.

The mothers are mostly awarded the kids by the court, even in cases where the father is clearly the better parent. Also, the courts would often slap the guys with child support based on the money they could make, not the money they are currently making. And if they cannot pay, they are going to the slammer.

“They see this as the fight of their lives, and they’re fighting the good fight on behalf of men and boys everywhere,” he said.

Sometimes the bloke can’t even see his kids. 😆👌

Byers said this can make it hard to have practical discussions over important elements of a divorce, like child support and parenting schedules. 

Here in Czechia you can demand shared parenting and then you will not pay any child support.

Neil Shyminsky is a professor of English at Cambrian College in Sudbury, Ont., who has talked about the manosphere in podcasts and online videos. He describes it as “a misogynist movement that feels that feminism has won.”

Feminism has achieved property ownership for women, votes for women, age of consent, no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, and the women can accuse a man of rape or abuse in many parts of the world without substantial evidence, believe all women, me too. In many Western countries men don’t even approach women, or like dealing with women at work for fear of repercussions. Second wave feminism has been rolled out to undermine the nuclear family, and reduce birthrates.

Feminism has been a resounding success if we consider the outcomes. Women are now the majority of students in universities. I would say many are in employment and in some urban areas women even make more money on average than men.

“Women have not just achieved equality, but now women are in the driver’s seat and that this is wrong, and it is both natural and good for men to be in positions of power and leadership.” 

The biggest complaint is that we live in a gynocracy, where the system caters to women, and is borderline hostile towards men and boys. There could be guys out there that can be critical of women in power but most don’t care. I certainly don’t.

The manosphere, broadly, takes the view that men and women should return to what are seen as traditional roles, he said.

Manosphere is a broad term and not all of its representatives are traditionalists. The MGTOW of old like Barbarossa considered traditionalists to be another side of the gynocratic coin together with Feminism. It is in fact expected of men to be traditional gentlemen, to court women, to get married. But the legal framework that we live in is anything but inspired by tradition. Basically it is expected of men to behave like nothing is happening and the women will do as they please. MGTOW provided the men with the original red pill and warned of the dangers.

Influencers who operate in this sphere suggest, “the only thing that women are good for is sex and popping out babies or maybe picking up after you,” he said.

Imagine maintaining a relationship with a woman that doesn’t fuck you, doesn’t want kids, unless you also don’t want kids, and that doesn’t clean the crib. The latter could in my opinion be done by the man too when the woman is nursing a baby or if she works long hours and brings home the cheddar. Relationships need investment from both parties that includes intimacy, children create a mutual commitment, and women don’t find house husbands attractive. They are much more open to home making, and the kitchen in fact, and expect the man to bring home the cheddar.

When these online misogynistic trends began emerging a decade ago, it was really a movement of single men, Shyminsky said.

Most of the MGTOW guys of old have been through a divorce. I was listening to many of them back then. Then there were those that saw their elders taste gynocracy and opted out.

“The greatest predictor of somebody identifying as a member of the manosphere is that they’ve been rejected by a woman recently,” he said.

Guys have gone through flaking, ghosting, divorce, and associated problems. Like honestly, how dare they complain?

He said it’s surprising to see it gaining traction among married men.

How many married men get no punani from their wives? 😆👌 How many are unwillingly in open relationship, where she is continuing riding the cock carousel with her male friends? Marriage rates are down but those few suckers that are married might get a revelation by stumbling over some manosphere content. 😆👌

“This is a sign that those tendrils of the manosphere that I was talking about earlier are just permeating deeper and deeper into spaces that are mostly populated by men.”

What are those places? Please tell!

Both Byers and Shyminsky see the manosphere as an issue driven by complex economic and societal problems, to which influencers offer simple solutions.

MGTOW offered a simple solution, not to play. You will have money in the bank, and you will not have a nagging fat wife around that will make your life hell. You can pursue your hobbies without anyone giving you negative feedback. Feminists complained and now YouTube suppresses the MGTOW handle. 😆👌 Like honestly ladies, didn’t you ask men to leave you alone?

“The problem [in their view] is that men aren’t men anymore. You got laid off from your job, because you are not manly, your boss is not [manly]. Maybe your boss is a woman,” Shymisnky said.

I never heard anyone in the manosphere talk like this. This is a straw man of a manosphere influencer. Average manosphere influencer doesn’t give a fuck if you lost your job or if you lost your job because of women. Granted, they might discuss men being laid off because of some gynocracy bullshit like accusations of sexual harassment, they don’t care about your wagie existence.

“If we want to fix it, if we want to solve the problem, men just have to be men.… You gotta be that much more manly, that much more masculine. And that’s when we slip into being toxically masculine.”

The average grifter will tell you to hit the gym or to make money to escape the rat race or something like that. MGTOW never cared if you are manly dude, or a low T dad.

Byers noted that he’s not a relationship counsellor, but said he does have a unique view on relationships through seeing how they come apart.

He is fucking divorce lawyer that makes money on splitting couples.

He said couples may be able to get ahead of marital breakdown over misogyny by having honest conversations about what they’re reading, watching and listening to online, and what they think about that content.

If your bitch leaves over you watching content for men, you have been liberated buddy. Like never let bitches tell you what you can watch. Bitches also don’t like it when you tell them not to have male friends. What is actually worse?

Like honestly, couples should communicate between each other the relationship. Who does what, where are the boundaries. If you cannot do it, just stay single. What’s the problem?