Tag: NATO

Ukraine’s NATO Carrot

So, I believe in this conspiracy theory…

Extending Russia relates to this RAND Corporation report from 2019. I believe that the Ukraine war and sanctions are a part of this strategy that actually predates the publication of the RAND report by at least a decade.

I have been wondering why Ukraine was never admitted into NATO before 2014? Because quite frankly, the US could have admitted Ukraine. Arguments such as military unreadiness or European opposition kind of don’t click. Czechia was admitted without having a NATO standard army, and I am not sure Czechia has a NATO standard army still.😆👌European opposition might be a more valid argument but the Europeans have otherwise been supportive of Ukraine to the point that now they might be the only suppliers of weapons to the Kiev regime. Don’t tell me that was a rare occurrence of sovereign thinking on the part of Germany when they rejected Ukraine’s NATO membership in 2008! Could they not flex the German government into it?

And my opinion is that this was deliberate. Basically, the Ukrainian bunny 🐰 would be lured by a tasty carrot 🥕 promising NATO membership. In fact Ukraine would become NATO de facto but not de jure. Ukraine would be NATO supplied and NATO trained but not a member of NATO and thus there will be no obligation to defend it directly. And this way Ukraine would be primed for a conflict with Russia in which they would be used as a cannon fodder and sacrificed on the altar of Russia anxiety.

This way you can get a conflict that you see now. A localized brutal war in which the NATO countries supply Ukraine fighting Russia. Getting an anti-Russian regime in Ukraine would entice Russia to seize Crimea and defend it. Russia was basically dragged into a conflict. Deliberately, and the Western countries have basically used the Ukrainians. 😆👌

Czechia Should Leave NATO ASAP

Czech normies normally flip out at this suggestion. This is a very unpopular opinion here in Czechia but I will voice it anyway…

NATO is going to cost us. Donald Trump wants an alliance. He does not want America to be our daddy. He wants defense partners that would spend on defense like Murica does. Presumably buying American weapons systems, and making America rich. Trump wants 5% of GDP to be spent on defense. The Czech minister for European affairs…

We have a minister for European Affairs

…says we can increase defense spending by increasing taxes. And my friends, I don’t want parasites like this minister to be advocating for bigger taxes. I want lower taxes, and a thinner state. No useless ministers, and no large military budgets.

If you look at neighboring countries like Austria, or Switzerland (Switzerland is like 5 hour drive from here), both of which are not in NATO, have very low defense budgets. Austria 0.84%, and Switzerland 0.70%. Somehow they don’t need NATO for defense, even the recent invasion of Ukraine didn’t make them join, unlike Scandinavia. For some reason they are not afraid of Putin.

Source

More NATO spending will mean less money for healthcare and education. There is no free college or healthcare in the US. While I am on of those that thinks this sector ought to be more privatized but there needs to some government involvement as this is imperative for maintaining high level of human capital needed for development.

Supporters of NATO are telling us that if we get out of there, we will need to spend more on defense. Like 26% of GDP as did Czechoslovakia in the interwar period. But Czechoslovakia was literally surrounded on all sides by hostile states with territorial pretensions. Czechia doesn’t have this problem. So we either have a choice, be a worthy ally to Murica or decide our own defense policy.

1 Million NATO Troops

How cute… I thought Ukraine is winning and driving those orcs from Europe…

My friend here probably believes that NATO is a single fighting force. He never asks how many divisions does Mark Rütte have? He never bothered to find out how big the armies of NATO member countries are.

Technically, the Europeans could probably muster a force of 1 million. But this would be a tremendous undertaking.

The West Promised USSR Not to Expand NATO

Not expanding NATO was honored until Lolita Island, Clinton. Faggots will say, Russia never signed any such treaty but there is such a thing as gentleman’s word. NATO is an alliance directed against Russia because Russia cannot be a part of NATO. The problem is NATO does not only protect the East European countries from Russia as is commonly thought, it also increases the testicles of the East European pipsqueaks and their willingness to conflict with Russia.

These poodles have lost their survival senses. Besides, East European Russophobia is the direct consequence of NATO membership. Somehow, Russia was not a threat in the nineties when they were not in NATO but it suddenly became when they are in NATO. Some prospective NATO countries like Georgia even had the balls to fight Russia head on. Same with Ukraine actually. They all thought they have NATO on their side. NATO membership will cost Finland a lot of money. A completely unnecessary expense as Finland faced no threat from Russia while remaining neutral.

Europeans are faced with a phantom Russian menace and extra expenses for military. The Americans are no longer keen on protecting them, and demand the European carry their own weight. Rearmament will be costly on the background of economic decline that is very much caused by the disintegration of trade with Russia. Not to mention, Eurocucks will get hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian refugees. It will cost more to integrate them than the economic benefits they will bring.

Sweden and Finland are a Consolation Prize for NATO

Some people were trying to troll Russia with the ascendancy of Sweden and Finland into NATO…

But few people understand the fundamental difference between Sweden, Finland, the Baltic States and Ukraine. One only wonders why Russia didn’t do Moldova style Pridnestrovie republics in the Baltics to prevent them from joining NATO but I guess this has to do with Russia not really considering the Baltics to be that important. And the same applies to Finland and Sweden.

With Ukraine, the issue is that Ukraine is Russia’s cultural space. The area that is today the Baltic States became Russian only after the defeat of Sweden and subsequent divisions of the Rzeczpospolita in eighteenth century. Ukraine is the cradle of the Russian state, and while this might appear mystical and irrational to Westerners. The latter fail to recognize this psychological drive. Putin explained this in the interview with Tucker, I fell asleep twice trying to listen to it… Putin does not want to allow Ukraine to become anti-Russia.

Some out there argue that Peter the Great’s window to Europe was Russia’s historical mistake. Russia has for centuries tried to be part of the West, part of the European political landscape. Russia even imported the Marxist experiment from the West, and tried to cozy up to the West in the nineties. Only to find out that they have no place there. The idea to secure the Slavic core, and the idea to look East and South have finally come to the fore.

Ukraine is a fine piece of real estate. It has fertile soil, natural resources, and access to warm seas. The latter is very important for Russia because the Russians do not have many of those. And while the access to the global oceans from the Black Sea is controlled by NATO countries. The latter are bound by treaties to let Russian shipping through and as long as this happens, Russia does not care.

The issue with having Sweden and Finland in NATO is no big issue for Russia. These countries were for decades hostile to Russia, and it does not matter if they have a seat in the Brussels headquarters of NATO. Russia has one folder for NATO, and used to have a separate folder for Finland. Now Czechia is required to help Finland should it be attacked by Russia. Russia never had any territorial designs on these countries, it is not historically connected to them. One only wonders, whether losing their neutrality was the right step?

Article 5

NATO alliance especially for the East Europeans (Czechs, Polish, Romanians, the Baltics, and other Europoor trash) is the promise America will come and save their ass from the Russians…

The East Europeans buy weapons mostly from America. But in the case shit hits the fan hard and say Lithuania gets attacked by Russia, how many soldiers can Czechia send to help Lithuania? Czechia has 30k soldiers, out of which 4k are active reserves. We have nothing.

Also, people do not realize that NATO most of all are national militaries and not some huge force.

NATO Unity and Resolve

NATO is more united than ever before. But the members are brutally arguing over sending troops to Ukraine. Overwhelming majority is against.

NATO cooperates more than before. But Britain accuses Germany of divulging sensitive information about the involvement of British troops in Ukraine.

NATO solidarity is stronger than before. But air defense is being withdrawn from Slovakia, the eastern flank of NATO. Slovakia no longer has air defense because it gave its S300s to Ukraine for the promise of air defense from NATO.

Funny propaganda game has been played around the air defense. After the S300 Slovak air defense was transferred to Ukraine, Italy provided its own air defense but that was scheduled to be moved. Anti-Fico types were saying this is because of Fico’s stance on Ukraine, Fico was complaining that he is left without air defense. Absolute shitshow…

NAFO are Soycucks and Fat Chicks

Next Sunday in front of the Museum in Prague, we want to show support for Ukraine. NAFO will be there too.

The above is a photo of a counter demonstration that gathers every Sunday on Wenceslas Square in central Prague. They are protesting a demonstration that regularly fils the entire square below of people concerned with the cost of living crisis. And while the people that occupy the square carry mostly Czech flags, the counter protestors around the museum carry the flags of Ukraine, the EU, and NATO. Ukrainian flag also hangs on the museum. It is surreal.

All I see are flags of the Czech lands, that is the national flag, and flags featuring the coat of arms of Moravia and Silesia.

And the NAFO dorks are usually soyboys and post-wall fat women. For some reason, they think that the people concerned with creeping impoverishment of the middle class are pro-Russian.

Ukraine by the way has a peculiar, cargo cult relationship with NATO.

Ukraine considers itself a member of NATO, even if it isn’t accepted into the alliance…

I consider Ukraine to be a member…

Will NATO Exist Beyond 2020s?

I sense it in the air, the North Atlantic alliance may soon unravel…

What leads me to believe this?

1) Former US president, Donald Trump was very critical about European countries not spending 2% of their GDP on defense as is their obligation under NATO treaty. Trump was reviled for almost everything under the sun, including his criticism of NATO allies but he was not lying. The Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs even admits this in their foreign policy strategy. I would bet there are forces within the US establishment that are very unhappy about this.

2) The new US president, Joe Biden, who was supposed to repair transatlantic relations, recently announced the creation of AUKUS, an alliance of the three Anglo-Saxon countries, US, UK, and Australia. This apparently deprived the French of a contract to build submarines for Australia.

3) Macron has once said that NATO is brainless, and there is a talk on the European continent of the formation of an EU army.

4) Turkey has broken a tradition of buying American weapons and purchased Russian anti-aircraft S400 missiles. The US threatened to withdraw delivery of F-35 and Turkey said it may buy Russian made warplanes.

Could all these controversies compound eventually to cause a break in alliance?