In galaxy far far away there is feminism…

Guys, I have been trying to define for myself the essence of feminism, and I seem to be unable to do so…

There is this American author critical of feminism named Carrie Gress, and while I haven’t read her work yet, I have a second hand account of what she defines as the constitutive pillars of feminism. They would be, smashing the patriarchy, free love, and witchcraft/occultism.

So, what exactly is patriarchy and is it even relevant today? Patriarchy is the dominance of the father, the father is the head of the household, the wife submits to the husband, the husband assumes the duty of a provider and protector, and the woman is the homemaker. These duties of the sexes are defined in holy books and traditions of various cultures around the World. Although, in the book of Proverbs we see women hustling on their own, not just being at home.

It seems that from day one, feminism has been in opposition to this arrangement. One thing I agree with contemporary feminists is that what they call patriarchy boxes the sexes into rigid categories of masculinity and femininity. I agree in as much that today women can make their own bag, and provide for themselves and potential descendants quite well, without reliance on a male. In some large cities, women out-earn the men. Although I am skeptical of the future of what I call bitch jobs with the ascendancy of artificial intelligence, as things stand, big city boss babes don’t need no man.

I am very much about the freedom of choice. Modern times have disrupted relations between the sexes and plenty of women are bossing around until they remain single and childless. There are also some women that subscribe to child free lifestyle, some even remove association with men. On the other hand, there are older boss bitches that regret not becoming mothers. Almost as if motherhood is woman’s primordial calling. Some bitterly say the feminists have sold them a bag of goods with their career woman propaganda.

And here is a problem that I see. If patriarchy boxes you in a gender specific role, why not have a freedom to follow a path defined by patriarchy? The problem is feminism absolutely removes the freedom from women to be homemakers subservient to men. The feminists are always critical of this mode of existence. And this mode of existence is not without its dangers. However, some women seem to gravitate to this kind of lifestyle.

From the five girlfriends I had in my life only one volunteered to pay her way in restaurants. And she was from a wealthy family. The rest of them were your regular broke bitch type that dated me primarily for money. And while they always had their mouth full of all kind of feminist garbage, there was the expectation on me to provide. You see, these liberal women want their cake and eat it too. They want the soft life provided by a man but wanna keep all that women’s liberation stuff, and not acknowledge male leadership of the household.

Leftists are accusing the right of seeing the women as baby making machines but isn’t this what the women were designed by nature to be? Leftist are also critical of women doing housework, and call it unpaid labor, and shame men for wanting the women to be homemaker by saying these men want a mother. But honestly, housework has become much easier with modern appliances. The vacuum cleaner that washes the floors is easier than the mop. The washing machine is easier than washing the dishes in hand. Many women don’t cook for shit anyway. They buy ready meals in Tesco and heat them in the microwave. Your grandmothers had it much harder and you bitches just don’t measure up.

Conversely, Men Going Their Own Way have always preached the women should not be allowed to define masculinity, they should not be allowed to shame men over their lack of utility for women. MGTOW points out the traditional view of men as disposable, and the exploitation of men by women. And while it criticizes the traditional view of masculinity, it paints a picture where men are rather disadvantaged in their relations with women.

Penis Envy

It is my contention that all the woman’s movement has been an attempt to equalize women with men because the former were kind of envious of the latter. It almost proves the misogynist right that the female sex is inherently inferior because otherwise the women would not demand privileges over men. Even their right to vote is an undue privilege. Once upon a time, only land owning men had the right to vote but then other classes have asked for their seat at the table. Either way, all the men are liable for a draft in defense of the state. Whereas the women have the right to decide about the direction of the state, they do not have to serve in the military. Never forget women elected Hitler but did not have fight in the war.

Women have always coveted the privileges of men without the duties attached to them. It was the middle class women that campaigned for the removal of discrimination of women in workplace. They wanted those office jobs. No working class woman ever said she wants to follow her husband into the coal mine. You don’t see many female plumbers or electricians even though nothing stops women from doing these jobs. And certainly none of the women will defend the state, the policy of which they determine by voting for politicians. For examples you don’t have to go far. Tinder here is full of Ukrainian women, I already matched with two.

Also, the more contemporary feminists were targeting male exclusive spaces. If your establishment did not allow women in, the feminist campaigners would be all on your case. The famous case of this is Boy Scouts allowing the girls in. Absolute madness! Women want to invade spaces traditionally deemed as male dominated, as long as those are bitch friendly as well, don’t involve hard labor and getting dirty. For instance, some governments have quotas for women in leading positions and other forms of affirmative action to get the women in. For how much push was there to get women in male spaces, there is no desire for instance to compete against biological males in sports.

Suddenly we acknowledge the inherent sexual dimorphism, after years of being bombarded by “women can do whatever the men can do” kind of propaganda. And if women are physically different from men, can they also be the psychologically different? I personally think women should be treated with equity. If they can pass the same test as their male counterparts, then they are in. And if they don’t pass, they can fuck off. Who gives a fuck if the place becomes male dominated in the process? At least everyone got an equal chance. But gynocracy is not about justice.

There is an attack on masculinity going on. Young boys in school are taught about toxic masculinity. For a long time the husband was depicted as a bumbling fool in commercials and TV series, always in need of the all wise and capable wife. There is the competent Mary Sue character in all the films. Who the fuck watches this shit anymore? Are they trying to elevate women this way, or are they trying to troll the audience? Are they so stupid to put such shit piece of writing on the screen? Do they expect the goyim to gobble up whatever shit they are served?

The feminists claim the men should be open with their emotions, there is nothing wrong with men crying or being emotional. This is all evil patriarchy boxing you in. But try actually being a crying pussy boy in front of women and they will lose respect for you, and their coochie will dry up. That includes self identified feminists. Women almost ubiquitously want competent, stoic, and strong men, and that’s why boys don’t cry. Similarly, the women claim they want men that are emotionally available but try expressing your love for a bitch and she will friendzone your ass sooner before you can say “I love you.”

Free Love ❤️

Free fucking love. Free love was part of feminism from day one. Little do the respectable public realize that the early feminists were often prostitutes and got wealthy sponsors to support them by selling their coochie. Because sex work is real work, you dig? But the feminist attitude towards sex is not clear cut. Much like the feminists would have mouth full of dick equality but very few would like to pay 50/50 in a restaurant, women say they want emotional men but they really don’t, the ladies would like to be sluts but they also want certain men to commit to them.

So, at one point you have women that are riding the cock carousel (manosphere jargon for having many sexual partners) and being completely unapologetic about it. Don’t you dare as a man criticize it, that would be slut shaming. But you have on the other point, women that claim all sex is rape because in each case a coitus happens the woman was somehow manipulated into spreading her legs. If you feel like your male brain is going to explode, you are not alone. There are also those women that tell men not to rape, I really hope the rapists have heard them.

When I say that free love was with feminism from day one, it is completely true, the types that have supported early feminists were libertines that wanted to smash multiple women. But really, this free love shit only took off when plastic condoms and contraceptive pills took off. This is like twentieth century. Before all this, there was abortion. Somehow there is little debate on the gore and danger of abortions (it can leave you infertile), or the side effects of hormonal contraceptive pill.

It would all be funny. We could laugh at Andrea Dworkin or Simone de Beauvoir and their prudish takes. We could laugh at the Slut Walk girls, or the bitches protesting Donald Trump in pussy hats but these women have influence upon policy. So on one hand sex work is real work, and prostitution ought to be legal (which it should), women are already selling there nudes to ultrasimps on OnlyFans. However, you also have the expanded definition of rape inspired by the consent theory. Essentially, if you listen to Andrea Dworkin, women can never consent to coitus, coitus is always forced. Unless you compensate the bitch financially I guess. It is funny that all of a sudden women are unable to give consent when drunk, women are not responsible for their safety when out at night but women are equal to men.

It needs to be added that the biggest supporters of this LGBT, cross dressing freak reading bed time stories to kids, and all this butt fucking, child molesting joy are liberal women. Political lesbianism is a thing. Women hate men so much they become lesbians. There are also mommunes, communities of mothers, where women raise children without male input. Bitches also abort male fetuses, that’s why they need abortion. So they can abort men! Many have virulent hatred of men that steams from some childhood trauma, remember Valerie Solanas? She was a wholesome feminist, a prostitute and a violent man hater. She established the Society for Cutting up Men. This is trauma elevated to the level of politics.

Modern society is a mass neurosis society, people act out their depressing through political action. This is not just about feminism, this is also about environmentalism and this kind of feeds into anti-natalism, which uses a combination of feminist and environmental arguments.

But I digress, there are women that realize this sexual revolution, and cock carousel is not exactly a good arrangement for women. It takes a toll on their psyche and is only available to them when they are young, and can attract Chad. All the women instinctively know that they are on course to become old hags with bad skin and few extra pound. The wall comes for all! And when that day comes, it is best to have a loyal simp husband or kids around that will take care of you.

But really boys, what would you do with girl that does not put out? I have no use for a bitch that is not fucking me. But I kinda expect the women to be homemakers on top of giving box. The former and the latter are the conditions for my commitment. Most women I met gave it up very easily. But if they clearly communicated to me that they want more serious commitment, like marriage, I would appreciate it. Instead all these women just shake their ass wanting to have some monkey ass fun.

Return of Polygamy

Also, if you remove patriarchy from the mating game. That is, back in the day if you wanted to take a girl out, you would have to ask the dad. And you give women freedom to choose their partners, humanity devolves from the civilized state to its default setting, and that is polygamy. Almost all the primates and simians are polygamous, and the majority of human societies are polygamous too. Monogamy really appeared (in the Western context at least) in Ancient Rome and the Greek city states, and later was solidified by the Christian Church. Monogamy only seems to be mandated by the New Testament and there it clearly panders to Greek custom. Monogamy was not the default for Europeans, even Alexander had multiple wives, multiple wives were also common among the Vikings and Ancient Slavs. Only 40% of men passed on their genes 🧬 compared to 80% of women.

If women are free to choose their partners they choose Chad and Tyrone. Or alternatively Pookie and Ray Ray that both have like 7 baby mommas. Monkey style! Smart bitches out there realize this is a shit deal, being dependent on the state for food stamps for yer keedz is a shit deal. Monogamy is was a civilizational invention from a time where there weren’t any fucking food stamps. It existed to protect women because it ultimately only benefits them to have a male committed by law to them. The modern problem is that highly sought after Chad does not commit to any bitch. There are of course mechanisms designed to punish the Chad for not committing but usually he gets away.

Another factor is the rise of STDs especially among women. These bitches ride the carousel and carry all kinds of nasty stuff.

Witchcraft

Feminism stands against the teachings of the Bible and is fundamentally anti-Christian. And if it is in opposition to God, it comes from Satan. A lot of feminists realize this and they identify as witches. Wicca may have been started by some old English perverts that wanted to dance with maidens naked under the moonlight but it was quickly picked up by political lesbians. Lesbian witch coven in outer space that uses force to procreate did not come out of nowhere.

I get the feeling that feminism is one big cringe shit test. Where is the consistency other than hatred of men? Why are the politicians pandering to this shit?

The problem is boys are simps, weak, and gay. And they give the girls everything, and the bitches rightfully take advantage of these weak ass bitch boys. MGTOW is the only answer to feminism. The only possible answer, not traditionalism, not bullshit like repel the nineteenth, no abolish no-fault divorce, only MGTOW. There is no bringing the sexes back together. There are only rights for men, pre-nups that will be honored, mandatory DNA tests. There is only MGTOW, there is wearing the pants in a relationship or going your own way. Fuck feminism wherever you see it. Feminists would like you to be a good simp and be considerate of women. You owe women nothing unless they give you the coochie, give birth to your kids, and help you out and make your life easier.