Climate change is not going to wipe out humanity, he argued, and past efforts that strive for achieving zero carbon emissions have made real progress. But Gates said that past investments fighting climate change have been misplaced, and too much good money has been put into expensive and questionable efforts.
This whole climate change propaganda is intended to extract more revenue from you for your bankrupt country. đđI just farted, released some methane gas into the atmosphere, I feel ashamed for fucking up the planet like this.
âHooray into battle against Western degeneracy! Slovakia bans adoptions by gay couples.â
This is fucking based. Fico is actually a leftist, a traditional social democrat and he has completely rejected the progressive social agenda. Really, my idea of gay rights is homosexuality decriminalized. Thatâs where it kinda ends for me. I tolerate depictions of homosexuality in popular culture, I am playing Baldurâs Gate III and enjoying it but that stuff is 18+. Homosexuality written right does not bother me.
I donât like gay, lesbo, queer shit aimed at kids. Teenagers that feel they are gay can always find friends, like some 60 year old anal predator on the Internet. Why push sexual content on the kids? Kids will figure this shit on their own.
Anything beyond what I just mentioned is a political agenda. Gay marriage, and gay adoptions are that. I get that some gay people, particularly the lesbians like to ritualize their relationship with marriage ceremonies and shit but the government needs people fucking and making kids in the process. Ultimately, gay marriage is only virtue signaling for progressive normies that think it is so backwards that homosexuals cannot marry. There is no other political benefit in promoting it. Progressive parties will get few votes and thatâs it.
Marriage as a monogamous union is something sacred I tell you. You have quite a few arrangements out there. Polygamy? Men can have multiple women throughout their lives. Multiple women at the same time. Monogamy is female centric, protective of the female. Of the wife. Today you have open marriages, husbands being cuckolded by feisty skans. The marriage institution is under threat, 50% divorce rate in Czechia. So at least we have a clear legal definition of what a marriage is in Slovakia. This is fucking based.
Czechia was a car superpower before the World Wars and after the World Wars but during the Commie days, Ć koda made cheap ass wrecks for the plebs and Tatra limousines for the Commie elite. Ć koda, together with Yugoslav Zastava, and the Soviet Lada had a very bad reputation for quality among Western consumers. The other commie brands were Polski Fiat and Dacia, which made bootlegs of Western cheap ass cars. The only positioning was towards price, it is cheap, buy cheap. Everybody is poor, buy cheap.
And following the break up of Commie block, and the collapse of Bolshevism, these companies werenât able to get off from their selling point of cheap ass cars. Ć koda was bought by Volkswagen and produced some more high end models but Zastava closed shop and Lada continued to produce cheap ass clunkers. The New Right types view individualism as selfish and immoral ultimately. But I would rather ride a Lada than be on bus in some places.
I live in a rural place, and I need a passenger car to get food and move things. I donât necessarily need anything high end. I wouldnât mind something simple as long as it has an automatic box. Personal vehicle allows you more freedom of movement. You really donât want to take the bus to shops out here.
It is funny that Westerners make luxury cars, and Easterners make cheap clunkers to appeal to the masses. And the elite in the East drives Western cars and the lower classes ride on cheap clunkers. And for some reason, many of the cheap clunker makers couldnât make it even in cheap ass market. They get pushed out by mid-tier producers and many mid-tier producers try making half decent cars. Dacia is no longer an embarrassment. In Uzbekistan people drive either Chrysler, GM Daewoo or whatever that is or Chinese vehicles, like BYD. The car situation there was really interesting.
Ultimately you need a vehicle to get from point A to point B without experiencing cultural enrichment or booty banditism. If there was any safety on the public transport in Western liberal nations than public transport could be a much better option but the cabins are dirty and the people are weird. And individualism to me means, I donât owe anybody anything. Iâd drive a fucking tank to work if it means I will not have to give a fuck about anything beyond safety on the roads. And yeah, Moscow went a long way to making metro look great but you can still experience cultural enrichment and booty banditism.
This is why I think BTC is a much superior asset than goldâŠ
Every time I mention my passion for BTC online, there is always some individual, who is skeptical about digital money and extols the virtues of gold and other precious metals, muh physical, muh precious.
But gold is not money. You cannot go to a shop and pay with your gold bars. You cannot store your gold bars in a purse even unless they are very small. You can sell them for fiat but there is a problem with storage. You can have them in a safe at home but safer storage would be with a custodian like a bank or a specialized company. But in the latter case you are entrusting your treasure to somebody else.
BTC allows for self-custody with a hardware wallet. And BTC is already money albeit not universally accepted. There are shops that accept BTC, usually online businesses selling electronics that are run by enlightened bitcoiners. I have already bought stuff with BTC. So far mostly Bitcoin infrastructure but also stuff for the garden. You can actually get a Visa or Master Card payment card that converts your crypto into fiat and can be used in most stores. I donât know of any such scheme for gold.
I am not sure if it is even ethical in our technological age to use gold as a store of value. Gold is used in electronics, and it would in my opinion be better if gold served the electrical and by its virtue the bitcoin infrastructure rather than remaining in a vault somewhere. Silver is an even better electrical conductor.
Gold has an inflation, around two percent per year. This is all the gold brought into the system mostly through mining. I was imagining a gold inflation caused by asteroid mining. But would you look at thisâŠ
This is pure alchemy. Gold is said to originate from exploding supernovae, and the alchemical sign for gold is the same as the astrological sign for the Sun. The stars are massive fusion reactors.
One only wonders if they can pull this off and make it commercially viable. They could at first make electricity and create gold, after 17 years, they could have the first batch of gold ready to sell, and then every year another batch. They could flood the economy with gold thus reducing its price. It seems like science fiction now but so does asteroid mining or even the universal adoption of Bitcoin.
All of these countries are lackies of globohomo except for Rhodesia. Rhodesia was a post-colonial settler state managed by white minority in the African country known as South Rhodesia. It was opposed by black nationalists that were often propped up by the USSR. It was abandoned by the Brits and the Americans but survived due to support from apartheid South Africa and the Portuguese East Africa. When Mozambique đČđż (country with the coolest flag ever featuring AK47) declared independence, this was the end of Rhodesia.
Israel is also a settler nation created by the British but settled with Jews. I wonder, are there any publications that talk about the relationship of Britain and the Zionist movement? Actually googling Britain and Zionism yields a lot of interesting information. Israel always found far more support than Rhodesia among the countries of the West. Because obviously, the international Jewry has much more clout than some farmers in Rhodesia.
Ukrainians and Croatians are similar cases in that they are two Slavic peopleâs with eastern antagonists that are very similar. Serbs, Croats and Bosnian Muslims are essentially the same people but divided by religion. Ukrainians and Russians are essentially the same people divided by ideology, and to an extent religion as well. The Croatians have pretty much won their struggle against the Serbs for lebensraum. But the Croatians, unlike the Ukrainians had their own historical state for centuries, and this makes them territorially defined. The Ukrainians are a modern day invention trying to assert itself.
Finland defended itself against the USSR. My Ukrainian great grandfather was a veteran of this war. Finland lost territory and now they are salty and coping. I am not sure what their struggle is. South Korea is a bourgeois regime on Korean Peninsula which was literally bailed out by American intervention. South Korea sucks in other ways compared to North Korea, their struggle should be to pump up those birthrates.
So technically they are all ethnonationalists, bourgeois, anti-egalitarian, apartheid, discriminatory regimes that are locked in struggle against âmore egalitarianâ regimes. Often in service of Western imperialism.
Drive on diesel that you can replenish in few minutes and drive on it for days. I donât understand why we Eurocucks are being forced to switch to electric vehicles instead of improving on the combustion engine and developing non-fossil sources of fuel? I intend to buy an EV only as a last resort.
This is Elon coming out of GMC Yukon
Why doesnât he ride in a Tesla truck? đ Why doesnât he promote his brand? A techno king that owns a battery bugman car company doesnât ride the horses from his own stable.
I am unable to follow everything but I am interested, whether there is currently in the Czech Republic a nationalist party that dislikes Russia and supports Ukraine but at the same time is not on the same boat with European liberals, supports remigration, ethnostates. There isnât, isnât there?
Filip VĂĄvra is a former Nazi skinhead, who loves Ukraine and hates Putin. Due to the nature of the Ukrainian regime, Ukraine has become a focal point for the Neonazi international. Large number of Russian Neonazis are fighting Russia in Ukraine. VĂĄvraâs gripe with Putin is that he broke up all the far right movements in Russia.
But here is the trap! Neonazis in Ukraine are literally funded by Soros. đ They are also funded by local oligarchs, who often happen to be Jewish. Ukrainian Nazis are literally patsies of globohomo funded by the Jews. đ And they are engaged in a proxy war with Putin. Their usefulness ends there. It begs a question who stands behind VĂĄvra given that the Czech secret services went full Putin on their ass. đ Far right types are always feds.
Is there a need for a nationalist party in Czechia that loves Ukraine? We have BabiĆĄ, he is now a member of European Patriots or whatever, his MEPs voted against Ursula. Libshits hate him, and he is leading in the polls. Although, he is part of the globalist elite with assets in the West, in Germany, France, US. He is not going to push for remigration. Also, support for Ukraine is literally support of globohomoâs proxy war against Russia.
Ukraine is not your classic ethnostate. I donât believe there is ethnicity called Ukrainian, no matter how hard they try to create it. Their ethnicity is Russian.đ Ukrainian identity is civic and to a smaller extent linguistic. But even the president, who is Jewish, reads Ukrainian from a teleprompter. đ The Czechs kinda existed here since 7-8th century. The Czech nation is a result of a nineteenth century larp much like the Ukrainians (Ukrainians are largely a twentieth century thing, also the Czechs to some extent). I am not sure this ethnostate is what a modern state needs to be. Look at where it led Ukraine.
One of the main narratives in the West is that Putin is a mad dictator, who just out of the blue attacked innocent Ukraine that was minding its own business. One must understand that Ukraine is a post-Soviet state with a diverse ethnic and linguistic makeup and borders drawn by the General Secretaries for convenience. Hence, Ukraine entered independence with a large Russian population and a Russian naval base on the Crimean peninsula.
And in this Ukraine, the West sponsored a violent anti-Russian coup by neonazi militias in 2014. This was literally an act of war. In modern times hot war is really a last resort when everything else fails. The most common ways are influence campaigns and pressure through financial and material embargoes. Western propaganda calls it hybrid warfare when Russia does it. And the so called Maidan was sponsored by the likes of US State Department, George Soros, Pierre Omidyar, the Czech embassy, the Dutch embassy, and many others. Basically all those entities gave money to violent Russophobes. Never forget that!
What happened in 2014?
The Maidan was an illegal usurpation of government by anti-Russian forces, and Russia did not hesitate and annexed Crimea. The Maidan also triggered anti-Maidan protest in South-East of Ukraine that led to the collapse of government in many areas. The eastern Donbas in particular slipped from Ukraineâs control. How much this process was helped by Russia is debated. The Ukrainians and their supporters have a tendency to focus on Russian involvement and the Russians on the other hand stress the agency of the locals. Both sides are actually correct on many points.
Russia did intervene to save DNR and LNR from being overrun by Ukrainian forces both directly, and by supplying the Donbas Militia with weapons. Was Russia wrong when it supported a clearly pro-Russian movement in Ukraine? Should Russia have stayed idly and allow the Ukrainians to crush the rebellion? Well, Russia actually almost did Pashinyan. Mind you humanitarian intervention is a thing since the days of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. In that NATO literally broke Serbia, gave Albanian separatists a state and put a big ass base on that territory. Real politik commanded that Russia as a great power should take action.
Little do people realize but the supporters of the Maidan in the West knew very well what this shit is going to lead to, that is civil war in Ukraine. If they didnât, then we are ruled by some incredibly stupid people and I doubt this is the case. And this is precisely why they blew up Ukraine. They turned Ukraine into a weapon with which they will attack Putin. The West wanted regime change in Russia for a long time, and better yet they wanted a break up of Russia into many Russias. Little manageable Ukraines that will be too weak to pose a threat and have a mind of their own.
Russia is not very aggressive, this is not Putinâs style. Part of this is because Russia isnât that strong but a great deal is due to Putinâs personality I believe. Putin treats brute force as means of last resort and always seeks a political solution to conflicts. He understands that for a lasting peace you need a political solution ultimately. Ukraine had ample chance to find a peaceful solution to the crisis.
One of these mechanisms was the Minsk accords. Both Poroshenko and Zelensky had a constitutional majority and could have implemented the political part of Minsk, and could have withdrawn troops from Donbas. This way they would leave Donbas rebels no choice but to implement their part of the deal. None of this was done. Ukraine also blocked water and electricity to Crimea, which is another casus belli.
It is now clear and confirmed by Western officials that the Minsk was never to be implemented and was only used to buy Ukraine time to rearm. Ukraine wanted to reintegrate the lost territories through force. To which Russia responded with invasion. Next, the Ukrainian government decided to defeat Putinâs invasion army. The Ukrainians and their Western supporters came up with various copes such as Ukraine is defending Europe, Ukraine is fighting dictatorship. In reality, Ukraine is fighting a cynical proxy war, and it is a proxy war as mentioned by Boris Johnson and Marco Rubio. A proxy war using Ukrainians as a cannon fodder for the interests of Western designs on Russia.
I must say that I have written countless posts discussing why Ukrainian is a peasant patois, and Ukraine is literally a twentieth century invention supported by anti-Russian assholes. And the counter argument to this is actually equally potent. All nations are invented, the Czech nation is a nineteenth century invention that really crystallized after 1918, the creation of Czechoslovakia. The German nation is a nineteenth century invention too, so are the Italians and the French.
And my biggest gripe with Ukraine ever was that the policies of the government completely contradicted what the country needs. I was always critical of the unitary nature of Ukraine, or trying to push the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian nationalism on a largely Russian speaking population. There are democratic means of maintaining a state like Ukraine. Federalism, and minority rights. You know what I mean but Ukraine never implemented any of this. They behaved like 1930s radical nationalists and blamed outside meddling when things didnât work out. đ
Another of my contention is that project Ukraine has always been an attempt to use the Khokhols to break Russia. Basically, outside powers like Austria-Hungary and Germany have sponsored this Ukrainian nationalist shit to get at their enemies. Inter-war Poland and Czechoslovakia were other victims of this policy. The agency was then taken over by the Anglos and used against USSR and modern Russia. And as long as Ukraine will pose as anti-Russia as Putin calls it, they will have a constant problem with Russia. Matter of fact, their radical nationalism will put them in conflict with all of their neighbors.
Ultimately, if you are a supporter of Ukraine, why do you support this Ukrainian self-destruction in the service of others?
Insomniac Resurrected 