So what the article amounts to, is men these days need to remain obedient simps and not exchange notes on what constitutes a good woman. Otherwise the feminists will try to cajole you into obedience by cries of misogyny. The article in fact glorifies cuckolds such as the streamer, Destiny.
The manosphere exists because men need to be educated on the dangers of dating women. Women need not worry, there will always be willing simps that would marry a town bicycle. Mia Khalifa was already married twice.
The manosphere does not exist to save the simps, the latter are welcome to marry a town bicycle if they think body count does not matter, and see for themselves what happens. Also Helen Lewis probably has a high body count if she writes articles such as the above.
And I got this photo, I recently rediscovered it on one of my computers…
The photo comes from one of those Slut Walk protests, here are some of the slogans that are intelligible..
What’s with these women wearing rings in their septum?
“Don’t tell me how to dress, tell them not to rape!”
By the way, it looks like a bloke holding the sign…
Modern women fear accountability. They fail to realise they are the weaker sex and have to act accordingly. They also do not realise that most men are not rapists. So who exactly is them that need to be taught? Feminists have hard time coping with reality.
The slut walk started because some policeman asked women to dress modestly to avoid getting victimized. Which lead to the hysterical protest demanding men just stop raping. This level of stupidity makes me want to bang my head against the wall.
The feminists don’t have a mind of their own and that’s why the adopt the thinking of others. And in this case they adopt some fanciful nineteenth and twentieth century imagining about history. Here they clearly adopted the feminist interpretation of the witch trials in the Early Modern period. There is some kind of a feminist fascination with this topic.
Similarly, the feminists, and actually other leftists too, believe in ancient matriarchy. This is also based on some late nineteenth and early twentieth century imagining about ancient past. It has largely been debunked, although there might have been some participation of women in hunting and even warfare, it was probably marginal.
Bottom line, feminists are just deluded angry trashy slags. It is a wonder so many women have their minds clogged with this ideology.
I have described the Saturn Return in women on my astrology blog. But what I see now is I have described a promiscuous girl in her twenties that has failed to achieve motherhood, and gets baby rabies by the age of 30. Maybe that was my own personal bias because it describes the kind of women I am used to dating.
But in Sophie Turner, who stared as Sansa Sark, I see another pattern. A party girl that marries young and has children early (although my mother also had me at 23, so rather this is the age women should have children) experiences a mental crisis as she approaches her Saturn Return and wants to relive her youth.
Either the baby daddy is a dead beat who probably treated her like shit and she got pregnant from him. Or the more likely option is the baby daddy had a provider mentality, and was generous but she reached the wall, and she thought she can do better.
Whatever this was, this looks bad, the age, the kid. Although, I am sure some will smash.
Logan Paul is a dickhead, he scammed people in some crypto rug pull scheme, and supported BLM rioters. I do not follow any of his shit, I have a too high IQ for that…
But the issue of his fiancé, Nina Agdal intrigued me. This is because this whole engagement breaks many of the rules in my book. You don’t give the ring to promiscuous girls after the age of 30, which is the case of Nina Agdal.
The internet is abuzz with people collecting information on how many men Nina has been with and somebody has counted like 57. Logan’s crew is known for dating hoes and pornstars and simp for them, so he is probably not feeling any pressure there but the internet is not his crew, they are much more red pilled on what is going on.
What pisses me off is that men have little standards these days, and would simp for a used up hoe when she decides to settle down. Logan Paul says she made him wait for sex. I wonder, did she make di Caprio wait for sex? Simps think that if a used up, 30 year old town bicycle makes you wait, she is training you for long term commitment. Why do guys allow themselves to be trained like a puppy?
If she makes you wait, know my son, there is a man in her past that smashed on the first date. The older she is, the worst this looks. Promiscuous hoes don’t deserve a fat ring (I heard Longan’s ring cost several hundred of thousands), they deserve my ABC programme for used up party girls. Antidepressants, boxed wine, and cats. Only this way can we uphold the cosmic balance but Captain Save-a-hoe and Ser Simp-a-lot fuck it up.
My friends, I don’t date single mothers. I like myself too much to trade my personal peace that I have as a man for some used up poosay. Single mothers are girls that would never give my skinny ass the time of day anyway in their prime. Now they are looking for a sucker to help raise Asshole Junior, and that would not be me…
There are many videos and articles out there about what it is like to date a single mother. I am not speaking from experience because all the women I ever dated did not have any kids. However, I know people and I know couples, divorced and separated couples, and I can make some observations. I would say that there are two types, good girls that like bad boys, and bad boys that like good girls.
Granted, all of the people in these combinations could be pretty trash. I mean what makes women date some of these bad boys anyway? Are they good for making this choice? I have this acquaintance of mine, and nobody says anything good about his father. I literally heard his dad did passive gay sex with some wealthy booty bandit to pay off his debts. 😂 His mother is a good looking woman, adjusted for her age of course, she was of course much hotter 20 years ago.
Can women that choose these men, gods only know on which criteria, be considered good? Or are these women trash like the rest of them. We gave women freedom to choose their partners and they go after the psycho that turns them into a single mother. Problem is this has little to do with intelligence. I know one hoe the literally has a STEM degree, and she is a single mother because she dated some paranoid twat. I know another that works in finances and she has two baby daddies. Both appear as some kind of womanizers that dumped her because she is a bit on the chubby side. I know another one that married a divorced guy that already abandoned one family and two kids. The low and behold he abandoned her too, with two kids on her hands.
These women never hate on their baby daddies. Often they are secretly in love with the baby daddy. Just scratch the surface and you will discover childlike nativité these women display. From what I hear, single mothers would even cuck the men they date with their baby daddies. That is baby daddy has come to her place to pick up Asshole Junior, and he busted a nut there while you were busting your ass at work.
Another type of single mothers are selfish and overall bad women that left husbands and boyfriends that were overall OK. Usually because of some stupid shit. My neighbor works for the state, and he went to university to do a masters programme to get promotion. His girlfriend was acting up they never go on holidays together. She dumped him. Long story short, my neighbor now has a new girlfriend and goes on holiday with her because he got that promotion. I have seen a very similar story in those TikTok videos, where women tell on themselves.
A friend of mine has a second baby momma already. He is a short, holding, dweeb that has a good job though. In my region that puts him appart from most dudes. He is also an easily manipulable simp. And it would seem the girls walk all over him, at least his more recent baby momma does. I am still puzzled why his first baby momma left him? I used to hit on his first baby momma back in high school. Unsuccessfully but perhaps that was for the better.
This country has a 45-50% divorce rate, every year some 50-60k people divorce out of a population of 10 million. Half of all the divorces are said to be filed by both partners but most of these marriages take the form of “I took my hubby to see the Barbie movie, and he liked it”. Another 30% of divorces are imitated by women and the rest by men. Granted, divorces here are not so brutal to men as they are in the Anglosphere. Almost half of the children are born out of wedlock.
I am going to keep it simple. According to what is out there, the men in the Barbie movie are either simps, or perverts and predators. Now if you do not identify with being a simp, or being a perv, then I don’t know what exactly you are doing watching that caricature of masculinity?
In my opinion, you should give as little of your shekels to Hollywood if you are a self respecting man. Hollywood hates your ass. Do you identify with orbiting Ken, who is permanently in the Friendzone? Or do you identify with groping perverts on the Venice Beach? How can you tolerate this utter mockery of your own gender? Only modern women would laugh at such denigration of man.
Women are now using the Barbie movie as a litmus test in dating:
The articles go something like, “I took my husband to see the Barbie movie, and he liked it“ If your girlfriend likes the Barbie movie, be a Chad and dump her, there is plenty more fish in the sea. In 2016, the litmus test for insufferable Karens was if they disliked Donald Trump, in 2023 it is the Barbie movie, pink cancer that needs to be avoided like plague.
That preaches a dissociative form of MGTOW. Although, the author says his NPNW is a completely unique ideology. He does not understand MGTOW based on his FAQ:
Is NPNW associated with MGTOW?
Officially no but there are a few similarities between the MGTOW philosophy and the NPNW philosophy so some men might support both movements at the same time. We officially do not support MGTOW because the fundamental core values of NPNW are no work and no taxes while MGTOW promotes being economically active members of society while not giving any money and resources to women. We also do not agree with the ”G” in MGTOW. Clearly an ”S” should have been in its place.
Some 10 years ago, MGTOWs were taking about going ghost. That is checking out of the society as far as possible. The emphasis in MGTOW is also on going your own way, which may involve working and paying taxes, or it may not. NPNW also appears to preach sexual communism where every incel will be awarded a female in her fertile years.
MGTOW has no such goals, it is not a movement, it is a philosophy and a phenomenon. The S above stands for Sent as in Men Sent their Own Way. Incels think that everyone is an incel like them, or incel in denial. That might be a fair point. But I would say most MGTOWs have seen more pussy than pussy begging sexual communists ever will. MGTOW have had shitty experiences with women, and this sent them on their own lone wolf path. MGTOW does not want political change, these guys want to be left alone by women and society to have fun on their own terms.
The universe does not owe you pussy. Also, I am not sure how you want to achieve not working without having some income. I personally do not want to work but I own real estate, and build my stocks portfolio so I can liberate myself from work. I still have to pay taxes on my income. I have hobbies that need financing. I live for me, and don’t need women or pussy. The problem of incels is they cannot see life beyond pussy. They don’t understand that great works of philosophy were written by guys that got no pussy in their life. These poor souls lack the intelligence to think beyond this basic biological paradigm.
But really, this actually touches the issue of male motivation. What is the point of being productive when you will still be rejected by women? And you will be rejected by women, 50% divorce rate. Every second married schmuck out there is dealing with this. Granted, marriage rates everywhere are plummeting. Do you owe this society anything if you are a single man? For instance, if there is a war, the state has the audacity to pluck you off the street and send you to die protecting the assets of the thieving class, while your women will cuck you behind your back.
This is a million dollar question because I would say motivation is at an all time low. I have been a to a meeting recently, where rich old boomers complained they cannot find people to mow the lawn. I guess the motivation here has to do with financial compensation for a job that sucks ass but still, I hear these complaints about the lack of working hands from everywhere. Not to mention, elders are also complaining about the Gen Z work ethic. Maybe the young know something we don’t…
So, I have recently re-watched an old video by the YouTuber, Barbarossa about the failure of traditional relationships between the sexes. Traditional shitshow relationships failing the minute women get their own money…
Especially the first part of this video is really worth watching for the context of this blog post. I have also seen a similar idea regurgitated in a French feminist publication Fémincène:
The real reasons for the emancipation of women, the true dangers that threaten it.
Pour Nikolski, ce ne sont pas les luttes féministes qui ont permis aux femmes de se libérer mais les progrès technologiques engendrés par la révolution industrielle ainsi que les avancées scientifiques et médicales.
It says that women’s liberation was more a consequence of technology and economics than feminist campaigning that permitted it. I would not declare a Féminicène just yet, as the industrial civilization that allows the women to be liberated was almost completely built and maintained by men. Oil drillers, coal miners, electricians, even computer geeks are usually men.
Recently I spoke to an elderly co-worker, who expressed relief at her husband being dead. And it intrigued me to ask why did she marry him. I was told that social pressure from relatives in her thirties made her seek out this poor sod and marry him. Otherwise she said she could never get the guys she wanted. Hence, the guy was a second choice to her, and it was Chad or nothing for her if it wasn’t for those pesky elders that were concerned about her not becoming an old cat lady.
And this is where it dawned on me. The women out there don’t love the men too much. They like Chad, and they want Chad. As for the rest of the blokes, the women only give them affection when they need something. This why you see average dudes like Destiny and Asmongold in open relationships. Their women get smashed by Chad and Tyrone, but they return because Destiny is a cool guy, I guess. Or is it because the two have large incomes from their online activities?
Source (watch the linked video, it talks in depth about the problem I have in mind.)
In more mundane settings, variety of desperate chicks, usually single mothers and similar trash, leftover bitches over the age of 25, ran through town bicycles and other liberated slags will often get a man they would not give the time of day when they were 17-19 years old. A lot of these hoes are very bitter they had to settle for Beta Bob, and disgusted with the realization that Chads used her for practice in her prime years.
You don’t want these used up trashy bitches to make life miserable for the guys that are mostly good. Good men don’t deserve to be the conduit for their anger with Chad. I believe that it is much better for these women to be single in the old age with cats and boxed wine. The poor, unattractive sods out there will have a peace of mind, a full bank account, and they could pursue their hobbies or creative interests. So could these cat ladies.
We literally have a 50% divorce rate, 30% of marriages don’t involve intimacy between the partners, and I read somewhere that only 10% of marriages are actually happy. Maybe those 10% of people are less selfish, or they involve an average Betty marrying a Chad that simps. I don’t know. I do not believe the times were any better ever. In the past people just lived in denial. There was a lot of cucking going on. Only 40% of men got to reproduce, compared to 80% of the women.
If anything, our time is more honest. Feminism has laid bare the female nature, modern medicine has liberated the woman from motherhood and becoming a baby making machine, women have declared they don’t need the men now that they make their own money. Only problem is women still abuse male desire to extract resources and help from men. From those men that they are not attracted to and would not even give pussy to. It is time for the men to realize they are being manipulated and assume a proper defensive position.
You can either rationalize being a cuck like Destiny, or you can have your dignity as a man, and ride solo. Embrace the values of MGTOW. I am not saying you cannot find a girl that will value you for you, will love you, and will be on the same page but I kinda don’t find many such couples. Is this the consequence of feminism and misandrist programming, or the expression of female nature laid bare by women’s liberation? Conservackucks blame the nefarious influence of feminism but people like Barbarossa think we are giving the feminists too much credit.
Personally, I think women are doing themselves a disservice by rejecting men but then again, I think many women out there are not fit for relationships, and should not enter the lives of men…
For a long time I have thought about how to tackle this topic. The topic of shysters preying on lonely men, trying to sell them their mediocre products for a lump sum of money has a long history and is quite varied…
There are now many female “dating coaches” (aka roaches) because while female loneliness is not as acute as male but it is growing and with it the audience of some enterprising hoes…
I don’t watch that shit regularly but from time to time I listen to what they fill the heads of young women with. I cannot make a good summary of their content. I would say it is more feel good shit but soyboy shit like Destiny is also geared at men.
I have observed several shyster tactics the dating roaches use:
1) They all promote some stupid and often borderline harmful activity. Mostly the classic PUA shit of pursuing women, which is a quick way towards catching herpes, or being accused of being a creep. Freaks such as the the Raw Eggs Nationalist or the Liver King were consuming uncooked eggs and raw liver on camera telling us that this is the quickest way to achieve a muscular physique. In the case of the Liver King it turned out he is on steroids.
This is when we are coming to body building as a way to win favour with women. This in my opinion is one of the stupidest trade offs there is out there. You fuck up your metabolism, risk injury, and all this for modern skanks. This is not to say I am against exercise, you don’t wanna be obese, that’s just as bad as being Zyzz. Being an athlete can definitely help you get with the chicks but rather than looks, you are playing the status and money game here.
Some channels out there promote passport broing, aka sex tourism from Western countries to places like South East Asia or Latin America. I am not against slamming non-white women or traveling to far away destinations to get your dick wet. I have done it myself. Although, these days if a chick is not up for a coffee in the town center after work, I cannot be bothered. The problem with these channels is they make things seem better than they really are. I don’t think women in South East Asia are more traditional than women in Europe. These places have been equally hit by modernity, they are just poorer. And really, you are just exploiting your financial prowess here, maybe if you are white also looks.
There is a video out there of Andrew Tate suggesting men should date trannies. He asked: “Would you rather fuck Hulk Hogan with a pussy or Megan Fox with a dick?” Both of that shit sounds fucking gay…
2) They either shame their audience or don’t tell your audience the truth. Shaming is very common practice among the roaches. It is a psychological manipulation where they are trying to provoke anxiety in their viewers about being inadequate. Feelings of inadequacy is there to help sell shit to frustrated teenagers whose hormones are raging. You will see these twats shaming men for playing video games. You know who else shames men for being into video games, the women. Roaches pander to female worldview all the time.
I have a mildly physical job, I walk 5 kilometers every day at work. So when I get home, all I want it to put my legs on the table, count some astrology, and immerse myself in some video game, reach level 30 and kill that nasty vampire. And no shyster on the internet will tell me I am doing something wrong. Obviously, excessive gameplay can be detrimental and you ought to dedicate you time to better pursuits but seriously, you also need to entertain yourself.
There was one freak on YouTube that went by the name Tribe of Men, and then when the latter got deleted the League of Men, who literally shamed his audience for having dirty underwear. Andrew Tate shamed his viewers for being brokies, although he literally made his money on harvesting simpbucks through cam girls. He even admitted to writing messages to the simps himself on behalf of the girls.
The credentials of Andrew Tate:
3) They all sell some mediocre and questionable product. Often some shitty PUA course, personal relationship coaching, or some book. If you have nothing else to read, you might give some of that shit a go but I consider time to be precious. They often mix in business advice but usually none of it is anything super special that will make you prosper, and usually you can find the same advice for free in YouTube videos or elsewhere.
Andrew Tate charged $50 monthly for his Hustler’s University. He used this marketing trick where it said the fee is reduced from $100. Although this FOMO inducing offer is said to be limited, it was hanging there for several months. Somebody actually leaked Andrew Tate’s lecture to YouTube and I listened to it while counting astrology. If you want to spend $50 on Andrew Tate chatting shit, you are welcome.
One interesting insight however, that Andrew Tate had in that talk was never to sell your product cheap. And I guess another roach took it to heart. Below is Hamza Ahmed, a gym freak that had a YouTube channel. He had this gig called Adonis University, where he charges $500 for a course. With $100 additional monthly fee. Information (absolutely follow this link) has it, Hamza made hundreds of thousands on this grift. That means hundreds to a thousand of suckers have subscribed to his course.
Why does Adonis date this?
4) Few of these freaks have anything to show for their efforts. You see Hamza above? I was pulling chicks like that when I was 14 and they let me play with their titties. I don’t know what is high quality at her. Is this all this roach could pull for his efforts?
Many of these guys are living examples of why what they are preaching should not be followed by anyone. The PUAs hunting easy girls often have STDs. Herpes is free and it is forever. Many of these fools burn out of this lifestyle. Remember Roosh V? He is now an overgrown hermit that talks about Orthodox Christianity. Same with Andrew Tate, who is talking about Islam now. It makes you wonder if he still manages his cam girl business, as that is absolute haram? Andrew Tate is in a bit of trouble with the Romanian authorities over his hoe pimping, and while I think he is innocent, the powers that be will use the women you associate with to destroy you.
5) They almost ubiquitously hate the MGTOW. PUAs are like incels, they hate anyone that doesn’t obsess with pussy. They cannot imagine there are guys who have dated and married modern women and can be so jaded by all this they swear off women altogether, even though unlike incel rejects they are eligible bachelors. For PUAs, MGTOW is messing with their bottom line, which are frustrated incels and blue pill simps that seek the help of dating gurus because dating modern women is hard. MGTOW tells men that the juice is not worth the squeeze and you are better off going your own way without having your worth as a man defined by women.
Insomniac Resurrected 