Author: insomniacresurrected

Ukrs Are Copying Russian Tactics

So, History Legend published a short video, where he discusses Ukrainians adopting Russian tactics…

He specifically mentions that the Ukrainian have adopted motorcycle squads, small tactical groups of infantry, and anti-drone nets around supply roads. All these innovations have one single denominator, and that is drones. Drones are the wild card of this war.

A small and rather cheap drone can destroy an expensive armored infantry vehicle. And giving the vehicle thicker armor, radar, electronic warfare devices would only increase the cost. It is not like Russia is not using them, but they use old models to deliver infantry, with the expectation that some will be destroyed. Motorcycle squad is an innovation imported from Africa. Motorcycles are fast, cheap, hard to hit by artillery or even drones, deliver storm troopers to a point, where they do the boogaloo.

NAFO turds have been mocking Russians for using motorcycles, not even realizing how effective this tactic is and how obsolete armored infantry vehicles are in the age of FPV drones. These idiots have mocked Russians for setting up nets along roads too. They call them cope nets but their effectiveness is so great Ukrs began to using them too to protect their supply lines.

Drones have forced assault groups to be small to prevent casualties. I have personally not seen NAFO making fun of this, they normally talk about Russian meat waves instead.

Ukraine’s NATO Carrot

So, I believe in this conspiracy theory…

Extending Russia relates to this RAND Corporation report from 2019. I believe that the Ukraine war and sanctions are a part of this strategy that actually predates the publication of the RAND report by at least a decade.

I have been wondering why Ukraine was never admitted into NATO before 2014? Because quite frankly, the US could have admitted Ukraine. Arguments such as military unreadiness or European opposition kind of don’t click. Czechia was admitted without having a NATO standard army, and I am not sure Czechia has a NATO standard army still.😆👌European opposition might be a more valid argument but the Europeans have otherwise been supportive of Ukraine to the point that now they might be the only suppliers of weapons to the Kiev regime. Don’t tell me that was a rare occurrence of sovereign thinking on the part of Germany when they rejected Ukraine’s NATO membership in 2008! Could they not flex the German government into it?

And my opinion is that this was deliberate. Basically, the Ukrainian bunny 🐰 would be lured by a tasty carrot 🥕 promising NATO membership. In fact Ukraine would become NATO de facto but not de jure. Ukraine would be NATO supplied and NATO trained but not a member of NATO and thus there will be no obligation to defend it directly. And this way Ukraine would be primed for a conflict with Russia in which they would be used as a cannon fodder and sacrificed on the altar of Russia anxiety.

This way you can get a conflict that you see now. A localized brutal war in which the NATO countries supply Ukraine fighting Russia. Getting an anti-Russian regime in Ukraine would entice Russia to seize Crimea and defend it. Russia was basically dragged into a conflict. Deliberately, and the Western countries have basically used the Ukrainians. 😆👌

US SA Missiles Are Over

I hear that the US has a shortage of Patriot missiles and needs missiles for itself and Israel. So sorry Ukraine.

One of the main critique people have against Russia is that their special military operation takes too long. But why would Russia speed up things seeing what is happening now? 😆👌 I am not sure how good the Russian intelligence is but they could have been aware that the Western stockpiles are not elastic and at one point there will be a serious issue with supplies. 😆👌 It was always a game of attrition and a game of chicken. Murica is simply unable to supply all of its proxies at the same time.

Ukrs are complaining that this will embolden Russia. Russia is going for the kill. Ukraine is cooked.

Semi-automatic Shotguns Against Drones

Duck hunting at war…

Source

The Czech media are reporting that the best weapon against the biggest menace of the Ukrainian war, the FPV drones is an automatic shotgun.

Ruská samonabíjecí brokovnice Saiga-12 z devadesátek byla určena nejen speciálním silám. Vystřelit dokáže až 45 ran za minutu

Above is a profile of such a weapon I found in the Czech media. The article above also says it is useful against small drones.

Ukrainian Porcupine

Propaganda in the Czech Republic regarding the Ukraine conflicts runs these narratives…

Ivan Gabal (sociologist, analyst) – “If Ukraine relents and accepts capitulation, we will have barbarians at the gates. And we aren’t in doubt that they will try to open the gates.”

You know what, at home we treat Ukraine as barbarians. Provincial bumpkins that haven’t built shit. Russia on the other hand builds nuclear reactors and flies into space. Ukraine could have been part of this, they had Yuzhmash and Antonov plants from the Soviet era. But this wasn’t good enough for the Ukrainian nationalists. The latter would rather have their quiet khutor (a hamlet) instead of being part of the dynamic Russian World. It would have been good for Russia, Ukraine, and the whole of humanity but instead we have war.

I absolutely reject any notions that Russia will continue attacking NATO countries after they are done with Ukraine. I don’t think Russia has the strength and would not have the strength to invade NATO for decades if ever.

There is another popular talking head that Czech media likes to feature. Vlastislav Bříza comments international affairs and here in this video he discusses “Ukrainian porcupine”. He says that we must prevent a scenario in which Ukraine becomes defeated and neutralized. This would mean a much greater migration into Czechia from Ukraine but also the Ukrs might begin to feel Zrada and join the Russians, forming a one huge horde in the East.😆👌 Ukraine should become a porcupine that would be a deterrent to Russia.

Otakar Foltýn says that Russia would suck in the resources and manpower of Ukraine and would regain its former strength if we allow it to reach the Slovak border.😆👌

Why I Want Big Russia

So, Westoids wanna Balkanize Russia and even China to create a set of weak and easily manipulable states with limited sovereignty, whose economy is completely controlled by Western corporations. Siberian Africa or Yellow Africa in the East. Nothing against Africa, Africa also needs to show Westoids the finger.

Meanwhile, the same people call for the European Union to integrate more. Because apparently, if we are together then we will be more respected, and have more influence. Therefore, what is good for me, ain’t good for thee. But Russia is also much more ethnically homogeneous than the EU. 70-80% of Russian population are Russians or ethnically indefinite. This makes Russia a national state of the Russians and carving it out into little Ukraines and Kazakhstans would be a problematic task.

But some can still dream, they can make up fake flags, fake identities, fake languages, they can create little Ukraines and Kyrgyzstans out of Russia, they can start writing Russian in the Latin script. If you think I am joking, I am not, I am only quoting what I have read and heard online over the years. But big Russia builds nuclear reactors and flys into space, what good for the advancement of humanity ever came from independent Ukraine or Kazakhstan? The Westoids wanna Balkanize their competitors to remain the only civilization that pulls technological and economic progress and thus indispensable and maintaining its hegemony. But competition is better isn’t it?

Church Facade Zrada

One of the biggest copes of Ukrs is claims of antiquity over Russia.

Kiev is far older than was said during USSR. (and it should be reconsidered and the right dates should be officially made public) I know about it that you my beloved city was alive for much longer.

You didn’t know it.

In 1982, the Soviet government the Soviet government celebrated pompously the 1500 years of Kiev. But actually the archeologists, the group of which was headed by Rybakov, Russian colleague of our Boris Paton and ideologue of the Soviet version of Kievan Rus knew that Kiev is much older.

But admitting that would mean to admit that…

  1. Kiev is much older than Moscow
  2. Delineate Ukrainian history from the Russian.

Nobody disputes that Kiev is much older than Moscow. That is self evident. Kiev might in fact exist since the Iron Age or perhaps earlier. But whenever these claims of antiquity are made by Ukrainians they always show churches built in Baroque style for some reason. These cathedrals and monasteries were all built during the Russian Empire.

LMAO, Zrada.