So, did my Etsy curses work? Time will tell. The forces move in mysterious ways, and as the Priestess reminded me, “Spellwork is a collaboration between the caster, the client, and the universe itself.” For now, we can only trust in the timing of the great unknown.
There is a direct spiritual connection between the Early Modern witches, and the Current Year feminists. At least some, like Ed Dutton, have made the connection. Forces move in mysterious ways…
Propaganda tells people to stop having kids to save the climate, feminism was astroturfed to reduce birthrates, and to drive women into workforce. And the governments want to offset the population loss through immigration. Immigration would caused society to fragment, individualization. Unhappy fragmented people make good consumers. People consume to make themselves happy. Welcome to late capitalism. And now please tell me how capitalism is good. 👍
Say women’s groups…😆👌
I asked grok who funds these women women’s groups. Basically the state and state approved public institutions like Comic Relief, the latter is an obnoxious leftist brainwashing machine. My time in Britain made me absolutely loath the charity sector. We also see UN and Soros in the list. I don’t think these organizations are interested in solving any of the crises they purport to tackle. Crisis means work, and therefore it must continue.
The current media and social discourse is full of attacks against the anti-left backlash, sticking heads in the sand, blaming men, right-wing populists, Putin.😆👌Take for instance the constant gaslighting of men to find their softer side to attract women, be a nice guy, listen, be a simp. Meanwhile, the women go out with abusive Chads, and nice guys finish last. We can’t have criticism of mass immigration.
Cologne municipal representatives banned themselves from criticizing immigrants leaving the AfD the only party that can level criticism. 😆👌
What an article have a I found…
Basically guys, modern women cannot handle being with men that value themselves.
“I’m kind of ashamed,” the 23-year-old university student [Kenzie Sproat] said. “I totally just listened to him, and then at the end, I was like, ‘What am I doing? I don’t know what I’m doing.'”
She first got involved in the long-distance relationship with an American military man a few years ago. She said the red flags began popping up six months in, when he began shaming her over her appearance, blowing up her phone if she didn’t respond to his texts and expressing jealousy over her friendships with other men.
Honestly, shaming your bitch over looks unless she is fat ain’t productive. And even then, you chose the bitch, or she chose you and you said yes, and if you don’t like how she looks find another. If a bitch flakes on you, don’t stress about it, bitches are like this.
However, if she has many male friends, that is a problem. In Czech we have this saying “Kamarád taky rád.” This means that the “friend also like“. He also likes some punani. These male friends are likely in the friend zone, they are potentially your replacement. Also a gay friend likes punani even though he prefers man’s butt. The gay friend is often her confidant, she tells him shit she doesn’t tell you, and she might be badmouthing your ass to him. Do you want this? There are Chads out there that keep a harem of women that are chasing after them, and boy the women are complaining about not being exclusive.
I don’t say Kenzie’s ex wasn’t an asshole in many respects but I would not call demand to keep contact with other men controlling. There should be some agreement between the partners and commitment to the relationship. I guess I am an idealist.
She thinks the online content he consumed — including Joe Rogan podcasts — weren’t a good influence, while “manosphere” creators like Andrew Tate may have shaped his outlook.
If there wasn’t a problem in modern relationships, Andrew Tate would never have been a thing.
“He would make jokes about how many good points Andrew Tate has,” she said, referring to the kickboxer turned controversial social media influencer, who describes himself as a misogynist.
Did Andrew Tate ever define himself as a misogynist or are his words taken out of context?
Family lawyer Scott Byers, who’s based in Swift Current, Sask., said he and his colleagues have started seeing some of the factors Sproat described becoming a reason for divorce.
It started with the pandemic and couples having diverging views on things like vaccinations, but that’s shifted more recently, Byers said.
Like honestly, if a man didn’t want to get vaccinated, the wife should respect his choice.
“As the years have passed since the pandemic, I’m certainly seeing more clients come in telling me, ‘My spouse isn’t the person that I knew when [we] met. He puts his ear buds in and he’s listening to these podcasts and a lot of thinkers associated with the so-called manosphere.'”
Byers said he believes online misogyny feeds a culture of coercion and abuse.
“It’s a new and unsettling dynamic.”
Manosphere teaches men not to be doormats, and to have expectations from women. Modern women consider this coercion and abuse.
He said one woman he represented told him that her husband had been injured on the job and, unable to work, started spending more time online and consuming what Byers described as “radical ideas” about gender.
Wanna bet she left him because he lost his job?
“He started to express views about how their children should be raised that my client just couldn’t accept,” he said.
We are not told the whole story here.
Byers said these men often want to represent themselves during divorce proceedings, animated by a perception that the family court system is biased against husbands and fathers.
The mothers are mostly awarded the kids by the court, even in cases where the father is clearly the better parent. Also, the courts would often slap the guys with child support based on the money they could make, not the money they are currently making. And if they cannot pay, they are going to the slammer.
“They see this as the fight of their lives, and they’re fighting the good fight on behalf of men and boys everywhere,” he said.
Sometimes the bloke can’t even see his kids. 😆👌
Byers said this can make it hard to have practical discussions over important elements of a divorce, like child support and parenting schedules.
Here in Czechia you can demand shared parenting and then you will not pay any child support.
Neil Shyminsky is a professor of English at Cambrian College in Sudbury, Ont., who has talked about the manosphere in podcasts and online videos. He describes it as “a misogynist movement that feels that feminism has won.”
Feminism has achieved property ownership for women, votes for women, age of consent, no-fault divorce, abortion on demand, and the women can accuse a man of rape or abuse in many parts of the world without substantial evidence, believe all women, me too. In many Western countries men don’t even approach women, or like dealing with women at work for fear of repercussions. Second wave feminism has been rolled out to undermine the nuclear family, and reduce birthrates.
Feminism has been a resounding success if we consider the outcomes. Women are now the majority of students in universities. I would say many are in employment and in some urban areas women even make more money on average than men.
“Women have not just achieved equality, but now women are in the driver’s seat and that this is wrong, and it is both natural and good for men to be in positions of power and leadership.”
The biggest complaint is that we live in a gynocracy, where the system caters to women, and is borderline hostile towards men and boys. There could be guys out there that can be critical of women in power but most don’t care. I certainly don’t.
The manosphere, broadly, takes the view that men and women should return to what are seen as traditional roles, he said.
Manosphere is a broad term and not all of its representatives are traditionalists. The MGTOW of old like Barbarossa considered traditionalists to be another side of the gynocratic coin together with Feminism. It is in fact expected of men to be traditional gentlemen, to court women, to get married. But the legal framework that we live in is anything but inspired by tradition. Basically it is expected of men to behave like nothing is happening and the women will do as they please. MGTOW provided the men with the original red pill and warned of the dangers.
Influencers who operate in this sphere suggest, “the only thing that women are good for is sex and popping out babies or maybe picking up after you,” he said.
Imagine maintaining a relationship with a woman that doesn’t fuck you, doesn’t want kids, unless you also don’t want kids, and that doesn’t clean the crib. The latter could in my opinion be done by the man too when the woman is nursing a baby or if she works long hours and brings home the cheddar. Relationships need investment from both parties that includes intimacy, children create a mutual commitment, and women don’t find house husbands attractive. They are much more open to home making, and the kitchen in fact, and expect the man to bring home the cheddar.
When these online misogynistic trends began emerging a decade ago, it was really a movement of single men, Shyminsky said.
Most of the MGTOW guys of old have been through a divorce. I was listening to many of them back then. Then there were those that saw their elders taste gynocracy and opted out.
“The greatest predictor of somebody identifying as a member of the manosphere is that they’ve been rejected by a woman recently,” he said.
Guys have gone through flaking, ghosting, divorce, and associated problems. Like honestly, how dare they complain?
He said it’s surprising to see it gaining traction among married men.
How many married men get no punani from their wives? 😆👌 How many are unwillingly in open relationship, where she is continuing riding the cock carousel with her male friends? Marriage rates are down but those few suckers that are married might get a revelation by stumbling over some manosphere content. 😆👌
“This is a sign that those tendrils of the manosphere that I was talking about earlier are just permeating deeper and deeper into spaces that are mostly populated by men.”
What are those places? Please tell!
Both Byers and Shyminsky see the manosphere as an issue driven by complex economic and societal problems, to which influencers offer simple solutions.
MGTOW offered a simple solution, not to play. You will have money in the bank, and you will not have a nagging fat wife around that will make your life hell. You can pursue your hobbies without anyone giving you negative feedback. Feminists complained and now YouTube suppresses the MGTOW handle. 😆👌 Like honestly ladies, didn’t you ask men to leave you alone?
“The problem [in their view] is that men aren’t men anymore. You got laid off from your job, because you are not manly, your boss is not [manly]. Maybe your boss is a woman,” Shymisnky said.
I never heard anyone in the manosphere talk like this. This is a straw man of a manosphere influencer. Average manosphere influencer doesn’t give a fuck if you lost your job or if you lost your job because of women. Granted, they might discuss men being laid off because of some gynocracy bullshit like accusations of sexual harassment, they don’t care about your wagie existence.
“If we want to fix it, if we want to solve the problem, men just have to be men.… You gotta be that much more manly, that much more masculine. And that’s when we slip into being toxically masculine.”
The average grifter will tell you to hit the gym or to make money to escape the rat race or something like that. MGTOW never cared if you are manly dude, or a low T dad.
Byers noted that he’s not a relationship counsellor, but said he does have a unique view on relationships through seeing how they come apart.
He is fucking divorce lawyer that makes money on splitting couples.
He said couples may be able to get ahead of marital breakdown over misogyny by having honest conversations about what they’re reading, watching and listening to online, and what they think about that content.
If your bitch leaves over you watching content for men, you have been liberated buddy. Like never let bitches tell you what you can watch. Bitches also don’t like it when you tell them not to have male friends. What is actually worse?
Like honestly, couples should communicate between each other the relationship. Who does what, where are the boundaries. If you cannot do it, just stay single. What’s the problem?
This is a very interesting video that unfortunately did not receive many views. I have decided to make a summary of it for this blog. So, in the 1960s global elites were concerned with rising population. The Chinese government introduced the one child policy for instance. But in the West they decided to employ less coercive methods to achieve the same result. Murica found a willing army of activist willing to persuade families to have fewer children. Gerry Alexander offers a view on the success of second wave feminism, and introduces a document from Planned Parenthood.
It is called the Jaffe Memo. Frederick S. Jaffe was a technical director of Planned Parenthood. The memo was addressed to Bernard Berelson, who was the president of the the Population Council. The Population council was founded by John D. Rockefeller III, and both Planned Parenthood and the Population Council received funding from the Rockefeller Foundation.
Population alarmists back then (and even today) followed the Malthusian model of population growth and food supply…
The campaign for population reduction or control also had Darwinian apart from Malthusian overtones…
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margret Sanger and its British counterpart, Marie Stopes were both into eugenics. Back then it was cool…
President Nixon was spurred by the 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report to order another one from the Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger…
Rockefeller Commission Report of 1972
Population growth was made a matter of national security… Nixon’s replacement, Gerald Ford approved the Memorandum.
And they did not just focus on the US…
The report was considered controversial and was classified for many years because of its global implications.
This movement means eugenics…
1968, Paul Ehrlich published the book The Population Bomb.
Encouragement of homosexuality, and women in workplace. Discouragement of private home ownership, abortion on demand…
Shit in the water…
Depression epidemic, depressed people are less likely to procreate.
Child education
Basically, people’s purchasing power is diminishing and with it the confidence to have kids.
What a headline. Source
Torches of freedom was a hell of a campaign but needs to be seen in context of its time. Smoking was traditionally seen as something not befitting a lady. Feminist movement provided an opportunity to get women hooked on cigarettes by labelling it as a rebellion and something that would make them equal to men.😆👌They even produced slim cigarettes that are seen in photos of females from 1920s. Smoking was not widely seen as harmful. By the way, Hitler introduced one of the first anti-smoking campaigns.
Somebody, who has been around the manosphere a lot will notice the ubiquitous anti-male messaging in the mainstream media. Mainstream media, even in Western democracies are under tight control. Often controlled by a handful of corporations, and under the watch of the government.
Modern academia and discourse believes men owe women…
Modern discourse has bought into the notion that men have for many centuries oppressed women, and therefore today, the progressive position is to give back to women. You will see attempts to place more women into fields where women are in the minority. Women in the minority is seen as a problem by the society. And it is not just some nerds in engineering. You have politicians and bureaucrats pushing women into the firefighter brigade, or the military.
Nobody cares about inserting men into female dominated fields like primary school teaching, publishing, many medical fields are also where the pussy is abundant. By the way, women in these fields are all major sluts. Your general practitioners office will always have a lot breast cancer advertising but you will rarely see anything men specific. Every academic that writes about men’s issues has to always introduce his work with a disclaimer that he is not out to keep the women down, and he supports equality and feminism. Men make a sizable percentage of victims of partner violence yet state resources are directed at violence against women.
I personally don’t think historical grievance is the real reason for gynocracy. This is a made-up construction in the spirit of Marxism. Gynocentrism is institutionalized simping and a female grift uniting to discriminate against men, and collect rent. Political parties also court the female vote. I would say the Democrats in Murica have overdone it. They chased the men away. In fact for many years the politicians assumed that by pandering to women will win them votes, and the men will follow because the men wanna get laid. 😆
There is institutionalized misandry, gynocentrism, but this shit runs deeper…
Women hate Donald Trump because he is a man. Derp, derp, muh abortions, get out of my womb Drumpf. Women are offended that women will let Drumpf grab them by the pussy because he is a billionaire. But the latter is true, why are women getting emotional over it? Trump loves women, look at how many wives he had, and how many children he has? Women are threatening 4b, a cultural appropriation from South Korea that aims to train men like puppy dogs by not giving them the poonani.
Vast numbers of American men ain’t getting any anyway. 😆 Sex strike by Drumpf hating fatties on TikTok is gonna only affect the few losers that wanna hit that. Feminists have threatened sex strike on numerous occasions in the past. It is a manipulative tactic of withdrawing intimacy extrapolated to the society. Nobody is buying it, the men are laughing.
Any, however valid criticism of modern females is met with a barrage of shaming accusations of inceldom or being into men. Modern women are beyond criticism. Criticism of women and their antics is misogyny. Misogyny is the biggest enemy of modern values. How dare you think women are promiscuous, emotional, lack leadership skills, and write junk literature?
Naturally an environment, where you cannot even say you don’t want fat women, breeds women that would choose a bear over a man. They chose a bear because these big city feminists hate men. They were taught to hate men in schools, in the media, popular culture, misandry would not get you banned on TikTok. Approaching women these days is almost impossible unless you are Chad. It is dangerous,, women would film your ass and post it on social media. You will be labeled a town creep. Women would give you the attitude for your approaches, your kindness would be properly rewarded.
Women hate the average or below average guy, and they get infatuated with Chad. Chad treats them like they deserve to be treated, and the women develop psychological issues from getting smashed by several Chads. Chad has no time for these broads. These knuckleheads then extrapolate their hatred of Chads to the vast army of incels out there. All the men are guilty of her poon getting stretched out by Chad. All men are pigs, all men don’t see her as a human. The fact is women don’t see the humanity of the majority of men.
Here comes the discourse of a toxic masculinity, where normal expressions of male behavior are pathologized as problematic. Feminists say that patriarchy hurts men too. This toxic behavior is what gets men laid, so ironically it is the women that set the rules of the patriarchy. The latter is biological, not ideological. Women like stoic, nonchalant assholes, and don’t let anybody tell you otherwise. Feminism is a parasitical ideology that feeds on these biological paradigms, and creates a half-assed ideology that only harms little boys that are forced into the school system.
So, feminists love witchcraft. The fascination with witches goes back several centuries ago. It grew out of late eighteenth century anti-clerical critique. The witch is seen as a victim of medieval Christian misogyny and patriarchy.
Feminists hate Donald Trump. And feminists into witchcraft cast spells against him…
They did this when he was first elected in 2016.
These women are on TikTok:
From dabblers to hard-core practitioners, witchcraft has been on the rise in the U.S. in recent years. It has become so trendy that there’s an entire TikTok hashtag dedicated to WitchTok, and it’s got billions of views. The occult has gained popularity in the political realm as well, once again on display during this election season.
There are many disturbed childless cat ladies out there that hate men. Christians would say they need Jesus. I think they need a penis. I heard regular dicking makes women happier.
Hags will be protesting in front of the Trump Tower in Handmaid’s outfit…
I do not understand the women’s derangement with Trump. Trump is not going to take away their beloved abortion. In fact, sex strike is the best way to keep away from pregnancy, and from ruin in some poor bloke’s life. I also wanna see pussy hats.
Funny shit is, I knew this about women even without some stupid study…
What I was always baffled is that game studios gave in to feminist critics and started making women in their games ugly. Feminists do not represent the women at large, they represent an ideology of power. Some feminists believe sexualisation of women in entertainment and advertising is male patriarchal exploitation of the female body. If you wanna appeal to women, you need sexy bitches with big tits that kick some ass. Personally, I don’t like playing a female character.
Feminists don’t give fuck about making games more appealing to women, they want to attack a male dominated hobby. How dare those men have fun, that’s sexism and misogyny! Honestly, if studios want to make money, they need to distance themselves from these ideologues.
Is surprisingly right wing, talk about horseshoe theory…
Once upon a time, women wanted to be like men. It was unfair that women had to raise children, and had a biological clock, and a 60 year old granpa is smashing some 19 year old slut and what not. Woman’s inability to work long hours in a factory was seen as a bad thing by socialist and capitalists alike. There is actually a strain of thought called. Xenofeminism that promotes technological solutions to gender relations. Transhumanism should undo patriarchy.
Back in the days, I recall listening.to some MGTOW podcaster, who advocated for artificial wombs, as it would remove the need for women in reproduction. I have also recently read about a Harvard researcher that said artificial wombs would usher in a communist utopia because it would remove family and thus property relations. (Don’t know if the second is true) But not all women like this technological upgrade to their biological predicament.
As we reported in January, artificial reproduction technology, including artificial wombs, is intended to replace natural childbirth, creating a world without mothers where a baby is just another profitable product that has to be purchased from the usual suspects.
In a bid to alert the public in Italy as to what is being planned, campaigners targeted the event on Saturday May 20.
Resistenze al nanomondo and FINAARGIT – International Feminist Network Against All Artificial Reproduction, Gender Ideology and Transhumanism – were joined by the Popular Assembly Resisting Transhumanism of Bergamo in organizing a “sit-in” protest.
Their protest was also supported by feminists from Genoa and Milan, by a Catholic network drawing support from various cities in Italy and by a Marxist group from Milan which also opposed the “Green Pass” (vaccine passport).
Two other separate protests were held at the same time at other entrances to the fair, the first by the feminists of RADFEM and Inviolability Network and the second by mainstream right-wing political parties the Brothers of Italy and the League.
Welcome to the postmodern world, where Marxists; Radical Feminists, and Catholics are on the same boat.
I personally would not oppose a technology like artificial womb and gene editing. I am personally a techno pessimist. Read The Machine Stops. And in my opinion a society dependent on the artificial womb would be very fragile. It would be dependent on a machine, high technology. This requires maintenance, and is prone to malfunction and sabotage. If the machine stops, the colony is fucked.
I wonder where these feminists were 30 years ago. Didn’t they always view the female predicament as unfair? Why do they suddenly want to be women and mothers?
Insomniac Resurrected 