I hear that a lot of holocaust propaganda, and plenty of holocaust survivors are hoxes and grifters. I don’t know the details, and don’t really care. Questioning the narrative about the Holocaust in this country can get you in trouble. The Holocaust, with all its attributes is an article of faith, and you are a blasphemer if you believe otherwise. I don’t know but people should have the freedom to discuss whatever.
😆👌
I profiled Lesya on this blog already…
So, this was literally the first thing to appear. I translate the text below:
You can call it body shaming, fat shaming or lookism but I am of the opinion that a military man should be the head of the Museum of Holodomor-genocide, who has been in Russian captivity and knows for real what is hunger and because of that he can understand the reason for Museum of Holodomor and not Mrs. Hasidzhak.
Read this for context.
So Netflix will cast the brown actor Alexander Abdallah, as the Swedish king Gustav III. Who fucking watches these ideologically motivated adaptations? When AI gets to a high level, there will be completely artificial visuals that will beat this slop.
This is a very interesting video that unfortunately did not receive many views. I have decided to make a summary of it for this blog. So, in the 1960s global elites were concerned with rising population. The Chinese government introduced the one child policy for instance. But in the West they decided to employ less coercive methods to achieve the same result. Murica found a willing army of activist willing to persuade families to have fewer children. Gerry Alexander offers a view on the success of second wave feminism, and introduces a document from Planned Parenthood.
It is called the Jaffe Memo. Frederick S. Jaffe was a technical director of Planned Parenthood. The memo was addressed to Bernard Berelson, who was the president of the the Population Council. The Population council was founded by John D. Rockefeller III, and both Planned Parenthood and the Population Council received funding from the Rockefeller Foundation.
Population alarmists back then (and even today) followed the Malthusian model of population growth and food supply…
The campaign for population reduction or control also had Darwinian apart from Malthusian overtones…
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margret Sanger and its British counterpart, Marie Stopes were both into eugenics. Back then it was cool…
President Nixon was spurred by the 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report to order another one from the Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger…
Rockefeller Commission Report of 1972
Population growth was made a matter of national security… Nixon’s replacement, Gerald Ford approved the Memorandum.
And they did not just focus on the US…
The report was considered controversial and was classified for many years because of its global implications.
This movement means eugenics…
1968, Paul Ehrlich published the book The Population Bomb.
Encouragement of homosexuality, and women in workplace. Discouragement of private home ownership, abortion on demand…
Shit in the water…
Depression epidemic, depressed people are less likely to procreate.
Child education
Basically, people’s purchasing power is diminishing and with it the confidence to have kids.
What a headline. Source
Torches of freedom was a hell of a campaign but needs to be seen in context of its time. Smoking was traditionally seen as something not befitting a lady. Feminist movement provided an opportunity to get women hooked on cigarettes by labelling it as a rebellion and something that would make them equal to men.😆👌They even produced slim cigarettes that are seen in photos of females from 1920s. Smoking was not widely seen as harmful. By the way, Hitler introduced one of the first anti-smoking campaigns.
Somebody, who has been around the manosphere a lot will notice the ubiquitous anti-male messaging in the mainstream media. Mainstream media, even in Western democracies are under tight control. Often controlled by a handful of corporations, and under the watch of the government.
Kaja Kallas is a daughter of a prominent communist and now she goes around telling us how they all suffered under USSR…
The Czech president, Petr Pavel was a member of the Communist Party until December 1989. 😆 He is today a darling of neoliberals and presides over munition initiative for Ukraine. Even more sinister, I have heard von der Leyen is from a family of Nazis. These EU, globohomo flunkies are all from Commie and Nazi families. Meanwhile, people like Trump are reviled, yet they have no family history of Nazi affiliation or Commie membership.
The defeat of Ukraine would cause an exodus of violent elements, weapons will be smuggled into the EU…
This will be an adequate comeuppance to countries that supported Ukrainian Nazis…
Timmy basically says something similar with a recourse to ancient history. But I shall make small correction. The cities that existed in what is now Southern Ukraine collapsed because of climate change several millennia before the domestication of the horse. The migration of Indo-European horsemen happened around the time of the drying of the Sahara. Formerly lush, green areas that supported large population because water is life became arid deserts and grasslands. Grasslands are perfect for horsemen, and they moved into the area and scooped up what remained of the old population. There wasn’t any war as Timmy says.
But the gist of his video is that the Goths, pushed out by the Huns from what is now Ukraine destroyed the Roman Empire. EU beware!
This is a topic I wanted to cover for a while. Ukraine is a place where historians are not safe, especially if they cover certain sensitive topics such as WWII or national identity. Often for these individuals it means ostracism, and denied employment opportunities. However, some have paid the ultimate price…
Vitaly Maslovsky was a historian educated in the Marxist Leninist tradition during the days of the Soviet Union. He worked in the Institute of Social Studies in Lvov until the early nineties, when he was sacked for publishing the book The Land Accuses about the deeds of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army in his native Halychyna, Western Ukraine. From then on, Maslovsky lived on a meagre disability allowance.
Nevertheless, he continued to work on monographs. In 1999, he published a book called: With whom and against whom did the Ukrainian nationalists fight during WWII, he published it in Moscow. Maslovsky was allegedly getting death threats because of his publications. On 26 October 1999, he was found dead in the staircase hall of the house he lived in. The death was caused by falling off the stairs. Some were wondering how the disabled Maslovsky was able to do such a jumping feat. Due to threats, his wife did not press charges. In 2005, the Jewish fund of Ukraine, posthumously published Maslovky’s monograph about Holocaust in Ukraine: The Holocaust of the Jews of Ukraine. the Beginning. Halychyna.
Oles’ Buzyna is the most prominent individual listed here (he even has an English language Wikipedia entry). He was a moderately popular book author, journalist, and tv producer in Ukraine. Buzyna opposed Russophobia and held the opinion that Ukrainians are a regional variant of the Russian people, and the Russian element in Ukraine is not foreign, or a residue of a colonial rule. Buzyna is the author of The Resurrection of Little Russia, and I have a copy in my library.
Buzyna was shot outside his home by Neonazis. His murderers are known but nobody ever went to prison for it.
Vladimir Shchukin investigated the Holocaust in Ukraine. He was found dead in his flat in Nikolaev.
Continuing from my last post on the matter, this deserves a separate entry…
NATO brought the West a half-century of security, and “this, in fact, is the beginning of another 50 years of peace,” said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee and a key player in the ratification effort. “In a larger sense,” he added, “we’ll be righting an historical injustice forced upon the Poles, Czechs and Hungarians by Joseph Stalin.”
Various pro-NATO shills will tell you that the Czechs, Poles, and Hungarians wanted to join NATO, and that might have been true but without the approval of the Western countries, this would not be possible. There actually were voices that had the foresight and knew this will eventually lead to conflict.
There was opposition to NATO expansion:
In Russia, NATO expansion, which continues to be opposed across the entire political spectrum, will strengthen the nondemocratic opposition, undercut those who favor reform and cooperation with the West, bring the Russians to question the entire post-Cold War settlement, and galvanize resistance in the Duma to the START II and III treaties; In Europe, NATO expansion will draw a new line of division between the “ins” and the “outs,” foster instability, and ultimately diminish the sense of security of those countries which are not included;
In his memoir, Duty, Robert M Gates, who served as secretary of defense in the administrations of both George W Bush and Barack Obama, stated his belief that “the relationship with Russia had been badly mismanaged after [George HW] Bush left office in 1993”. Among other missteps, “US agreements with the Romanian and Bulgarian governments to rotate troops through bases in those countries was a needless provocation.” In an implicit rebuke to the younger Bush, Gates asserted that “trying to bring Georgia and Ukraine into Nato was truly overreaching”. That move, he contended, was a case of “recklessly ignoring what the Russians considered their own vital national interests”.
Not expanding NATO was honored until Lolita Island, Clinton. Faggots will say, Russia never signed any such treaty but there is such a thing as gentleman’s word. NATO is an alliance directed against Russia because Russia cannot be a part of NATO. The problem is NATO does not only protect the East European countries from Russia as is commonly thought, it also increases the testicles of the East European pipsqueaks and their willingness to conflict with Russia.
These poodles have lost their survival senses. Besides, East European Russophobia is the direct consequence of NATO membership. Somehow, Russia was not a threat in the nineties when they were not in NATO but it suddenly became when they are in NATO. Some prospective NATO countries like Georgia even had the balls to fight Russia head on. Same with Ukraine actually. They all thought they have NATO on their side. NATO membership will cost Finland a lot of money. A completely unnecessary expense as Finland faced no threat from Russia while remaining neutral.
Europeans are faced with a phantom Russian menace and extra expenses for military. The Americans are no longer keen on protecting them, and demand the European carry their own weight. Rearmament will be costly on the background of economic decline that is very much caused by the disintegration of trade with Russia. Not to mention, Eurocucks will get hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian refugees. It will cost more to integrate them than the economic benefits they will bring.
Was liberated by…
Hold my beer, here comes Der Spiegel:
Amerikanischen Armee befreit…
Insomniac Resurrected 