Google Zrada

Source

Aleksandr Snyhir

Good day

About a month ago I attempted to enter Russia though the Shermetevo Airport (Moscow) with a Ukrainian passport. Before the journey I completely wiped out unneeded information from my mobile phone.

The vast majority of photos I had in Google photo. When I deleted the photos, they arrived in a bin, and when I deleted them in the bin, Google gave me a message that “they were permanently deleted and cannot be restored.” In Shermetevo I was denied, they asked and then I saw that a part of those photos from Google were somehow restored.

Please share if you had a similar experience with Google photo in particular, when Google promises the photos cannot be restored after deletion.

You know what is interesting. I can understand the restoration of recent photos, which were made with a phone that I currently have (I have renewed the phone 1.5 years ago). But they have restored data from 2019, which were uploaded into cloud from another phone. That is, there cannot be a mention of these photos on the phone because they exist in the cloud but were deleted already a year ago. I hope I explained it clearly. 😆

This is the problem, it was not publicly accessible on the internet, if that is what you mean. The photos were preserved on the phone at the application Google Photo, these are hidden, private data. So only I had an access to them and after I tried to completely delete them (for instance from gallery) they managed to restore them after all.

I am simply trying to understand this situation, how does this system work so I do not repeat the same mistake next time I try to enter. Is it a problem with Google Photo, and has anybody encountered a similar problem?

Woke Left Will Unravel in a Spectacular Way

What actually is the woke left and why is it gear for a spectacular failure?

Well, the woke left follows so called Cultural Marxism. Leftoids say this is an antisemitic conspiracy theory because apparently the vast majority of the theorist of Cultural Marxism were Jewish, and it is apparently antisemitic to point this out. It is also a conspiracy theory because this ideology has pretty much taken over the campuses of Western universities, and you are a conspiracy theorist for pointing this out. These arguments are designed to attack the moral character of critics of the Left. But the so called Cultural Marxism has clear origins in the Frankfurt School, also known as the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University Frankfurt. Which by the way existed on generous grants of a wealthy Jewish student that was into Marxism, Felix Weil.

The Frankfurt School was born out of a crisis of Marxist ideology that was apparent in latter nineteenth century. The Marxists could not reconcile the dogma laid down by their founder, Karl with the fact that far from being exploitative, the capitalist system was making the lives of ordinary people better. Mind you, the Imperial government of Germany instituted things like pension schemes, and the material wellbeing of the working class was steadily increasing. Theorists such as Eduard Bernstein for instance, rejected Marx’s notion that capitalism would collapse. Further dismay came from the general failure of Marxist revolutions following WWI. Bolsheviks, with their Red Terror were not exactly to the liking of the bona fide champagne socialists in Western capitals.

I don’t even know why it is still called Marxism, I guess such is the impact of that bearded knucklehead that this label cannot be escaped. Why not Leftwing Capitalism? (Also, terms like progressivism and postmodernism float around, make them make sense) Because this is what it actually is. The Frankfurt School with its synthesis of Marx and Freud provided a bourgeois friendly ideology which was more concerned with the rights of sexual minorities, and did not evoke the image of armed workers storming the palace. There was one Antonio Gramsci, who while languishing in prison in Mussolini’s Italy advocated for a slow march through the institutions, and this is exactly what they did. And quite frankly some of its championed causes kind of predate Marx himself.

For instance Feminism is a child of the revolutionary period of late eighteenth century. Socialism itself is not an idea original to Marx. Maybe this is because Marx was a rather unoriginal thinker and his theory was rather born of critique. Cultural Marxism replaces the working class with other disadvantaged groups, such as women, the LGBT, racial minorities, and also in recent years the disabled. Each group, in theory should support the other groups because they all have a single enemy, the white male. This is called intersectionality. For a long time this shit existed in universities, I remember having this taught to me in early 2000s. But since then it seems to have infiltrated other places, not just the government institutions but also the business sphere. In some places, this is the dominant ideology now.

It is interesting how everything this ideology touches is not improving but rather creating a backlash from the silent majority. It seems that these groups that the woke left champions aren’t well served by the leftoids. This was never really about helping the women, the gays, the refugees. This was about using these groups to gain power and grift some taxpayer cash. In many ways leftism is highly parasitic, it feeds on the carcass of liberalism, the gospel of liberty, equality, and fraternity and shits out stinky turds. And it is my contention that much like Bolshevism in Eastern Europe, eventually all this woke shit will be flushed down the toilet because it does not work, and people don’t want it.

Reigning ideologies have a staying power because the people invested in them are not going to easily let go but eventually they unravel, and the more you keep the lid on the better the show in the end. What I want to in the rest of the post is to explore some of the areas wokeism infests and how they are doing.

Feminism

Once upon a time, there was the idea of making women equal, giving them right to own property, the right not to be discriminated against in workplace. The problem is feminism was married to the Marxist idea of class struggle, this is how the gender war was begun. Women are labeled the historically oppressed class, and men are their oppressors. This is why women need to benefit from affirmative action, quotas, and male only spaces are sexist. This no longer is about equality of the sexes but rather the empowerment of women at the expense of men. It reaches ridiculous proportions when you have chubby police women, or secret service female officers in charge of protecting VIPs. The latter thing is a subject of widespread ridicule.

In entertainment, we have been getting Mary Sue characters, a girl boss that knows it all and can do it all, smelly men step aside, hear me roar! I don’t know if this is an attempt to empower the women, or gaslight the audiences. Wokeism is a one big mass gaslighting, it is presenting something obviously ideologically motivated, and then shaming your audience for noticing they are being propagandized in the lamest possible way. Lately there is also the trend of putting ugly women on screen because that also empowers the masses.

Feminism is a seriously maladaptive phenomenon to have in your society. It might benefit some companies that women apply for jobs but the latter cheapens the workforce, and now families need two incomes to sustain themselves. Women with children work less, and that’s why Feminism is highly antinatalist. Abortion is the main area of struggle for women today. Women wanna kill their kids while there is still time. The birthrates are dismal, and this is going to have dire consequences for the future. Low birthrates are exacerbated by Feminist campaigning, the various #MeToo and believe all women make men just simply quit.

LGBT

In a sense, LGBT is a baby of feminism. Back in the days it was the women, who were most supportive of gay rights. Ironically, the radical Feminists do not like guys that dress like women. On the other hand there are women that dress little boys in girl’s dresses because masculinity is evil. I have also heard about the sissy boy to cross dressing pipeline. Bottom line is these are some fucked up people, why do they get a platform?

Homosexuality was legalized like a long time ago but the grift must go on. Here in Czechia, all LGBT NGOs are sponsored by the state and somehow the change of government never means any change to this sponsorship. I could seethe about my taxes going to LGBT organizations, however it is worse than meets the eye. These organizations exist to propagandize the children, and Prague Parade is overtaken by people with kinks and fetishes. This is another form of gaslighting.

They want your kids! Drag Queen Story Hour didn’t come out of nowhere. Many pedos use drag as a cover. If the majority objects to your grooming, you can gaslight the majority with claims of transphobia. We don’t have to go far, recently, the online celebrity, Mr. Beast defended one of his collaborators in this way. Not to mention all the kids that are being sissified with puberty blockers. This is the end, my friends.

Racial and Ethnic Minorities

While Murica is naturally diverse, a country of immigrants and has migration of Latin Americans mostly, who pick cotton or something, in Europe things are a little different. While, immigration to Western Europe until the nineties was motivated by filling the void in workforce created by WWII, since then the “refugees welcome” mass immigration was largely ideology. Its purpose was to gaslight the right, the nationalists. Creating this diversity would put the native lower classes on the defensive. If they get defensive, the repressive apparatus of the state will be unleashed on them. Hate speech laws, behave peasants!

Middle class people, while economically right-wing have completely resigned on doing anything about mass immigration. The Conservatives in UK, or Christian Democrats in Germany all welcome immigrants. Not welcoming refugees will earn you the label “racist”, and this acts like cryptonite on the feckless center right. But mass immigration literally destroys communities. Western cities periodically erupt in riots. Usually some low life, like George Floyd, gets killed by the cops and this is seen as a license for other low lives to ransack the city. But the native population is not far behind, anti-minority violence is on the rise too.

The latter, that is the natives fighting back is being mercilessly suppressed by the authorities, this is called two-tier policing, this is building resentment, and creates an enemy out of the cops. Two-tier policing was introduced by woke activists, who thought police is institutionally racist against blacks. One only wonders what else is two-tier? BLM rioters were calling for the police to be defunded. Ironically, the absence of policing leads to shops being looted, and businesses closing shop in immigrant infested areas. The immigrants ironically are the losers here.

The woke policies with ethnic minorities also push for more diversity in the work place at the expense of particularly white men, although white women or Asians are also excluded. It is funny that the East Asians are discriminated against only because they happen to be economically and academically successful rather than being viewed as historic oppressors of darker races. In entertainment, for instance in historical dramas, blacks are cast in main roles, and if you complain, you will be called a bigot.

Will woke lead to broke?

I have been in the past more optimistic about the market dynamics when it comes to woke ideology but I have since become more skeptical. We are dealing here with ideologues, leftist ideologues, and the latter generally do not give a fuck about profitability. If they did, the Eastern Block would not go bankrupt in the eighties. These guys think they have a higher purpose, they think they are better than you, and they believe they are on a mission to spread the message. It makes them feel better about themselves.

But this is going to end badly, Western countries will be aging, with a disaffected male populace, infested by hostile immigrants. Drag queens are going to be the major form of entertainment. It is going to be fun.

Larry Fink Reminds Ukrainians Whose Land it Is

Absolute landchad, Larry Fink

Fink says that in discussions with Zelensky, they took into account Fink reminded Ukrainians that they are using a lot of valuable black soil farm land as burial grounds. He offers to invest in crematoriums and bio rework. (whatever the latter is)

He threatens to sanction the Ukrainian for not using their investment assets as they are intended.

PS: I don’t know if the above is true. It was posted on a Telegram channel Tucker Carlson in Russia and other.

UPD August 2024: This topic of Ukrainians being buried on BlackRock’s land has resurfaced again. Bulgarian politician, Plamen Paskov said that BlackRock Financial Market Advisory and other companies demand that burials should not be made on fertile land.

47% of the land has already been purchased by BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity and Vanguard. I wonder if Russia liberated all the fertile land in Ukraine, which is located in the Middle Dnieper area, would these funds benefit from the land. After all, Westerners are banned from investing in Russia.

I Became a Bitcoin Maxi

And this is my final verdict on cryptocurrency…

My plans to own a portfolio of cryptocurrencies have changed abruptly after a moment of mental clarity. Pretty much following my post on analyzing cryptocurrencies, I came to dislike all the altcoins. I am not trading these and I just need the king to hodl. And that’s BTC!

BTC does not have a known founder and the software is pretty much not subject to any drastic changes. There are adresses believed to be belonging to Satoshi Nakamoto but he has never moved his Bitcoin unlike say Vitalik Buterin did with Ethereum.

Also BTC has a limited supply. It is a finite resource. I personally don’t think any of the other coins present an alternative. Maybe Monero with its encrypted transactions could find uses but Bitcoin is king. And there is no place for another.

So I converted anything that I had into BTC, and will not buy anything else from now on.

Pattern of History

What are you curious about?

I am curious about human history at least from the beginning of the Holocene. The various technological revolutions like Agriculture, Metallurgy, and Coinage. I am trying to find a discourse to speak about them, and identify secondary revolutions.

For instance, Agriculture led to the growth of material culture, and the birth of first cities. And while Agriculture meant corralling of herd animals, Metallurgy ment corralling of the people. The master and slave relationship was born, without which the birth of the first civilizations wouldn’t be possible. Coinage, developed in the 5th century BC made Industrial Revolution and capitalism possible many centuries later.

Karl Jaspers described the last revolution as the Axial Age. Not only coinage was developed but this was a philosophical and religious revolution, first histories were written. This form of speculation also contributed to the scientific and industrial revolutions centuries later.

And following the pattern we are up for another technological revolution about a thousand years from now, which will bear fruits again in several hundred years after that. This is a question to the futurists, Ray Kurzweil thinks technological singularity is near, so it cannot be what I think. Provided, Kurzweil is wrong and there will be a dark age and regression on the way, which would also follow the pattern.

The eventual outcome is humanity becoming a type I civilization on the Kardashev scale. This means that it will use the entire energy of planet earth. Fossil fuels might be finite and dirty but energy is actually abundant. It is a question of how we harness it, store it and use it.

Benefic Conjunction

I am an astrologer, I am unapologetic about my pursuits. If you think astrology is bullshit, you are an ignorant…

Astrologer Dmitry Uranus 😆 During the last two years I have watched the Rashists conduct massive rocket attacks many times during the Moon (Luna) Jupiter conjunction. This is very strange, astrology considers this summit to be auspicious. It seems that an astrologer on the top gives advice to Russian military. He chooses “maximally favourable dates” for mass rocket attacks to achieve maximum results

And the conjunction of Luna and Jupiter will be now on 30 and 31 July. And if my theory about the advice of a Rashist astrologer is true we can expect another attack. I can say with certainty that the probability of an attack is very high.

The astral map is much more complex and populated now than simply a summit of Luna and Jupiter. Today on 30 July, Luna was in conjunction with Mars.

The post is cut off here. Luna Jupiter summits occur every month because it takes Luna to travel through the Zodiac. Jupiter is kinda slower and it takes like a year for it to travel through a zodiac sign. Some say the Chinese years follow the journey of Jupiter.

Further, there appears to be a Saturn in square to that Luna, Jupiter, Mars stellium, which is also in sextile to the Sol (the Sun). And Luna is waning and not very illuminated. Dark moon of the receding cycle.

Whatever!

This is from the same kind of kitchen as Putin consulting Siberian Shamans…