So, I have recently re-watched an old video by the YouTuber, Barbarossa about the failure of traditional relationships between the sexes. Traditional shitshow relationships failing the minute women get their own money…
Especially the first part of this video is really worth watching for the context of this blog post. I have also seen a similar idea regurgitated in a French feminist publication Fémincène:
Pour Nikolski, ce ne sont pas les luttes féministes qui ont permis aux femmes de se libérer mais les progrès technologiques engendrés par la révolution industrielle ainsi que les avancées scientifiques et médicales.
Source
It says that women’s liberation was more a consequence of technology and economics than feminist campaigning that permitted it. I would not declare a Féminicène just yet, as the industrial civilization that allows the women to be liberated was almost completely built and maintained by men. Oil drillers, coal miners, electricians, even computer geeks are usually men.
Recently I spoke to an elderly co-worker, who expressed relief at her husband being dead. And it intrigued me to ask why did she marry him. I was told that social pressure from relatives in her thirties made her seek out this poor sod and marry him. Otherwise she said she could never get the guys she wanted. Hence, the guy was a second choice to her, and it was Chad or nothing for her if it wasn’t for those pesky elders that were concerned about her not becoming an old cat lady.
And this is where it dawned on me. The women out there don’t love the men too much. They like Chad, and they want Chad. As for the rest of the blokes, the women only give them affection when they need something. This why you see average dudes like Destiny and Asmongold in open relationships. Their women get smashed by Chad and Tyrone, but they return because Destiny is a cool guy, I guess. Or is it because the two have large incomes from their online activities?
Source (watch the linked video, it talks in depth about the problem I have in mind.)
In more mundane settings, variety of desperate chicks, usually single mothers and similar trash, leftover bitches over the age of 25, ran through town bicycles and other liberated slags will often get a man they would not give the time of day when they were 17-19 years old. A lot of these hoes are very bitter they had to settle for Beta Bob, and disgusted with the realization that Chads used her for practice in her prime years.
You don’t want these used up trashy bitches to make life miserable for the guys that are mostly good. Good men don’t deserve to be the conduit for their anger with Chad. I believe that it is much better for these women to be single in the old age with cats and boxed wine. The poor, unattractive sods out there will have a peace of mind, a full bank account, and they could pursue their hobbies or creative interests. So could these cat ladies.
We literally have a 50% divorce rate, 30% of marriages don’t involve intimacy between the partners, and I read somewhere that only 10% of marriages are actually happy. Maybe those 10% of people are less selfish, or they involve an average Betty marrying a Chad that simps. I don’t know. I do not believe the times were any better ever. In the past people just lived in denial. There was a lot of cucking going on. Only 40% of men got to reproduce, compared to 80% of the women.
If anything, our time is more honest. Feminism has laid bare the female nature, modern medicine has liberated the woman from motherhood and becoming a baby making machine, women have declared they don’t need the men now that they make their own money. Only problem is women still abuse male desire to extract resources and help from men. From those men that they are not attracted to and would not even give pussy to. It is time for the men to realize they are being manipulated and assume a proper defensive position.
You can either rationalize being a cuck like Destiny, or you can have your dignity as a man, and ride solo. Embrace the values of MGTOW. I am not saying you cannot find a girl that will value you for you, will love you, and will be on the same page but I kinda don’t find many such couples. Is this the consequence of feminism and misandrist programming, or the expression of female nature laid bare by women’s liberation? Conservackucks blame the nefarious influence of feminism but people like Barbarossa think we are giving the feminists too much credit.
Personally, I think women are doing themselves a disservice by rejecting men but then again, I think many women out there are not fit for relationships, and should not enter the lives of men…
Insomniac Resurrected 
I mean plenty of men aren’t relationship material, the whole thing is mirroring itself:
Manipulative wenches have their equivalence in the abusive jocks
Daddy issues girls in guys with various shades of the Oedipus complex.
Then ofc historically all those homosexual men that married and had kids…
LikeLiked by 1 person
It actually isn’t a mirror but a magnifying glass. These days, vast numbers of men are riding solo, the abusive jock actually attracts the females, and the beta Bob is left to pick up the pieces.
LikeLike
True, but you could turn it upside down and say that abusers and bettas are ruining it as much as feminist wenches.
As for 10% of happy marriages, they exist, and it happens when children raised in such ones find each other, i guess you lived in bigger cities most of your life, but it’s not uncommon in smaller places.
PS. My biggest distaste is directed mostly toward Betta guys though. Heterosexual men with effeminate characteristics enabled a lot of dumb shit in history.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They literally took down the “no girls allowed!” sign from the tree house. See Boy Scouts and what happened to them.
LikeLike
I wanna add something; the daydreamer type tend to be attracted to abusive jocks. They always bitch about it but always end up with ones like it anyways. Also, Peter Pan syndrome is happening to both genders nowadays. I think the key is parenting. The way I see it, middle-class upbringing, no matter if it’s the pampering or the abusive tradcon ones, is ruining everything for everyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women want Chad and Chad will naturally be abusive because managing all these hoes takes a toll on his psyche. Chad will also cheat and do a quick one on the hoes. TikTok is full of girls crying about the guy just packing up and leaving. Honestly, is it that they are all insufferable and the men flee, or that they are all dating the same narrow number of men? Or is it a combination of both? Speaking of Peter Pan syndrome, women fucking around in their twenties and not wanting kids in their prime years is what it is.
LikeLike
You know what? Let’s just stop playing blame games nor that “defending my tribe” bullshit. I’ll admit I did play it for a while, but after I seen enough since around mid-2010s, I’ve came to a realization: it’s not solving any problem. I mean what we got? Just us pitying each other, being angry and treat anyone who disagrees with us, or we feel suspicious about as bartender or maid regardless of gender – speaking of suspicion, been with the right wing and all that for so long, I’m all too familiar with the type of pig-headed paranoia and that unexplainable, highly irrational type of anger. This is why I’ve been leaving both the rights and the lefts alone nowadays, as I’ve realized how much I loathe tribalism. Not to mention the Chinese always lose at this blaming/victimizing game anyways…and just as we think we’re winning, da dah! Conspiracy of Chinese infiltrating US and have them going all preachy Gandhi ass on me or just simply calling me shit and act like Chinese the yellow Jews…another story. All in all, I can’t stand the full-on autism, I put it this way.
So back to the topic, you do remember I showed you this article, right?
https://www.neatorama.com/2012/03/08/why-ladies-love-angry-men/#:~:text=According%20to%20research%20by%20psychologist,that%20their%20partner%20is%20upset.%22
It was back in 2012, 11 years ago when things such as rational and healthy discussion still exists and when folks older than 18 don’t confuse unhealthy behaviors and unhealthy communication style as “epic” or “based” or “gangsta”. And folks had more tendency to say it as it is WITHOUT that anger…things were kinda bad, but a cakewalk compares to how it is today. See, back then, folks came to a quick realization…even some women themselves, do recognize the “TikTok crying girls” phenomenon. Same phenomenon can be found on Tumblr as well. Basically, they just keep dating Chad, Tyrone, Bubba, Jose and Ahmed, or even ex-con version of them as good numbers of such women treat prison records as PhD, then they complain about “all men are assholes”. So yes, matured women do exist, but it’s just they’ve been so severely suppressed and a few years after 2012, folks just stop trusting any form of healthy communication…and the next thing we know, is how they begin to set standard that “any woman who’s not a thot is not a real woman”. That said, you can’t help but wonder…who is setting such standard? Sure, there are those thot influencers out there, but you know, they won’t let you see it that easily unless they really want you to see it. So what’s the gender of those who set such standard? I mean, is any of the CEOs who set such standard a woman?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Normally it was that women policed other women. But somehow with modernity, the younger types rebelled against the elder and their simp boyfriends encouraged them to it. I have read about this while studying relationships in 1920s and 30s. There was this rebellion against the Victorian norms, and the older broads found themselves powerless against the tidal wave of liberated THOTs. This whole shit did not start yesterday, granted the women did not have piercings in their noses back then. Industrial civilization allowed women to have the financial freedom to do whatever they want with their lives. It started with the upper class but then moved to the masses as the wealth distribution increased.
LikeLike
Now, if you’re talking about the Victorian age of disciplinary, most folks would’ve rebelled against that, no matter how you look at it. Shit, I don’t think even guys necessarily want that neither. As far as financial freedom goes, I say it’s mostly about the very concept of “from poor peasants to somewhat rich” itself is to blame. Many boomers and gen X came from that shit. Such sudden change of living standards allow one to oversimplify things and have a rather awkward and one-sided sets of priorities in life, which is what caused the middle-class upbringing we see, where they can become really overbearing in terms of preventing children from seeing the world, overly disciplinary in terms of academic performance and that whole “making my kids fall in line” bullshit and yet, spoil the shit out of the kids materially, and the worst part of how these middle-class parents actually take themselves that seriously. That, in conjunction with lack of healthy real life socializing, may be the direct cause behind the massive Peter Pan syndrome among millennials and gen Z. The liberal democracy, which allows one to be convinced that they’re free, seem to have made it hundreds times more complicated.
LikeLike
As for Peter Syndrome, can we just admit that people, regardless of gender, are all pretty fucking childish. I’m not even gonna use the self-righteousness among both the lefts and the rights as examples. I’ll go even more basic than that. You know you’re dealing with men-children or women-children when they keep confusing toxic form of communication as “being real” and “being truthful” and that whole “look at what he/she said? He/she is fighting for us and sacrifice for us by cussing an alt-right/left out and bullying someone to suicidal”. This type of behavior exist within both men and women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Personally, I do not blame women for being immature about life in our soyciety. I too go to work and just work a little on astrology and the play video games until I crash. There is nothing wrong with a little escapism when you don’t have that many responsibilities. Some people out there think some political ideology is gonna save them. That ain’t coming, leftist progressivism is a road to hell but the conservacucks with their backward thinking are not going to stop that. Few people are trying to think forward. There is no going back to trad for many people but little acceptance of the woke shit either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So is my RuneScape waifus building. The thing I’m talking about is not necessarily escapism themselves. It’s about how folks are going about it. You see, I set myself a limit that once I hit 99 on all skills, I’m quitting. But the men-children and women-children out there will become so addicted to it that I’ve heard a Twitter rumor of some dude literally shit his pants over skilling on RuneScape. Now, that is pretty Peter Pan by my dictionary. Also, pay attention to how they communicate…temper tantrums, bullying for the sake of ego, blame shifting and treating a politician as some sort of messiah or their parents as either walking Gods or walking devil for that matter…all of which reeks of immaturity. Guess what? Both genders do that. Gender relationship become so warped that even 10 years ago seems so much more reasonable as I’ve mentioned, is the direct result of it. We’re living in the age of second and third generation of middle-class, that’s why.
LikeLike