Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine was Totally not Unprovoked

One of the main narratives in the West is that Putin is a mad dictator, who just out of the blue attacked innocent Ukraine that was minding its own business. One must understand that Ukraine is a post-Soviet state with a diverse ethnic and linguistic makeup and borders drawn by the General Secretaries for convenience. Hence, Ukraine entered independence with a large Russian population and a Russian naval base on the Crimean peninsula.

And in this Ukraine, the West sponsored a violent anti-Russian coup by neonazi militias in 2014. This was literally an act of war. In modern times hot war is really a last resort when everything else fails. The most common ways are influence campaigns and pressure through financial and material embargoes. Western propaganda calls it hybrid warfare when Russia does it. And the so called Maidan was sponsored by the likes of US State Department, George Soros, Pierre Omidyar, the Czech embassy, the Dutch embassy, and many others. Basically all those entities gave money to violent Russophobes. Never forget that!

What happened in 2014?

The Maidan was an illegal usurpation of government by anti-Russian forces, and Russia did not hesitate and annexed Crimea. The Maidan also triggered anti-Maidan protest in South-East of Ukraine that led to the collapse of government in many areas. The eastern Donbas in particular slipped from Ukraine’s control. How much this process was helped by Russia is debated. The Ukrainians and their supporters have a tendency to focus on Russian involvement and the Russians on the other hand stress the agency of the locals. Both sides are actually correct on many points.

Russia did intervene to save DNR and LNR from being overrun by Ukrainian forces both directly, and by supplying the Donbas Militia with weapons. Was Russia wrong when it supported a clearly pro-Russian movement in Ukraine? Should Russia have stayed idly and allow the Ukrainians to crush the rebellion? Well, Russia actually almost did Pashinyan. Mind you humanitarian intervention is a thing since the days of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. In that NATO literally broke Serbia, gave Albanian separatists a state and put a big ass base on that territory. Real politik commanded that Russia as a great power should take action.

Little do people realize but the supporters of the Maidan in the West knew very well what this shit is going to lead to, that is civil war in Ukraine. If they didn’t, then we are ruled by some incredibly stupid people and I doubt this is the case. And this is precisely why they blew up Ukraine. They turned Ukraine into a weapon with which they will attack Putin. The West wanted regime change in Russia for a long time, and better yet they wanted a break up of Russia into many Russias. Little manageable Ukraines that will be too weak to pose a threat and have a mind of their own.

Russia is not very aggressive, this is not Putin’s style. Part of this is because Russia isn’t that strong but a great deal is due to Putin’s personality I believe. Putin treats brute force as means of last resort and always seeks a political solution to conflicts. He understands that for a lasting peace you need a political solution ultimately. Ukraine had ample chance to find a peaceful solution to the crisis.

One of these mechanisms was the Minsk accords. Both Poroshenko and Zelensky had a constitutional majority and could have implemented the political part of Minsk, and could have withdrawn troops from Donbas. This way they would leave Donbas rebels no choice but to implement their part of the deal. None of this was done. Ukraine also blocked water and electricity to Crimea, which is another casus belli.

It is now clear and confirmed by Western officials that the Minsk was never to be implemented and was only used to buy Ukraine time to rearm. Ukraine wanted to reintegrate the lost territories through force. To which Russia responded with invasion. Next, the Ukrainian government decided to defeat Putin’s invasion army. The Ukrainians and their Western supporters came up with various copes such as Ukraine is defending Europe, Ukraine is fighting dictatorship. In reality, Ukraine is fighting a cynical proxy war, and it is a proxy war as mentioned by Boris Johnson and Marco Rubio. A proxy war using Ukrainians as a cannon fodder for the interests of Western designs on Russia.

Curtis Yarvin is Red Pilled on Ukraine

Moldberg enjoys New Order, just like me…

I must say that I have written countless posts discussing why Ukrainian is a peasant patois, and Ukraine is literally a twentieth century invention supported by anti-Russian assholes. And the counter argument to this is actually equally potent. All nations are invented, the Czech nation is a nineteenth century invention that really crystallized after 1918, the creation of Czechoslovakia. The German nation is a nineteenth century invention too, so are the Italians and the French.

And my biggest gripe with Ukraine ever was that the policies of the government completely contradicted what the country needs. I was always critical of the unitary nature of Ukraine, or trying to push the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian nationalism on a largely Russian speaking population. There are democratic means of maintaining a state like Ukraine. Federalism, and minority rights. You know what I mean but Ukraine never implemented any of this. They behaved like 1930s radical nationalists and blamed outside meddling when things didn’t work out. 😆

Another of my contention is that project Ukraine has always been an attempt to use the Khokhols to break Russia. Basically, outside powers like Austria-Hungary and Germany have sponsored this Ukrainian nationalist shit to get at their enemies. Inter-war Poland and Czechoslovakia were other victims of this policy. The agency was then taken over by the Anglos and used against USSR and modern Russia. And as long as Ukraine will pose as anti-Russia as Putin calls it, they will have a constant problem with Russia. Matter of fact, their radical nationalism will put them in conflict with all of their neighbors.

Ultimately, if you are a supporter of Ukraine, why do you support this Ukrainian self-destruction in the service of others?

Baldur’s Gate to Be Made by the Creators of Veilguard

Baldur’s Gate III was a really cool game, and I had lot of fun playing through it. But the Larian Studios that made it will not work on a sequel.

That Park Place writes:

It’s worth remembering that Swen Vincke was the backbone of the Baldur’s Gate 3 project. There have been long-standing rumors that Wizards of the Coast had little idea what to do with the Baldur’s Gate IP. Initially, they reportedly showed minimal interest and only handed it to Larian as a quick cash grab. However, once Baldur’s Gate 3 became one of the most beloved and critically acclaimed video games—at least in the eyes of many—Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro seemingly began interfering in future plans, asserting more control over the decision-making process.

My information is that WoC and Hasbro have a long term issue with their D&D franchise, the products are simply not selling the way they would like. BGIII made a breakthrough in rendering the D&D experience digital, and commercializing it. And they wanted to milk the fucker.

After Larian Studios ended its relationship with Wizards of the Coast and reportedly moved on to develop its own new IP—rumored to be a sci-fi RPG—Wizards of the Coast began looking for new developers for its Baldur’s Gate sequel. But from what we’ve gathered, that process didn’t last long, as it seems they decided in the end—along with Hasbro, probably—to create a subsidiary game studio, Skeleton Key, and have Baldur’s Gate 4 developed in-house.

***

Yet here’s the dilemma: the people who have been hired into this company might not be the best team for Baldur’s Gate.

***

…Corinne Busche, the game director at BioWare, a self-described advocate of DEI who also pushed for top surgery scars in video games, something Busche also implemented in The Sims 4 while working for Maxis.

Surgery scars in video games. 😳

Concurrently, they are trying to change the narratives of the original game. There is an attempt to humanize the orcs, something similar was done in the recent Tolkien inspired Amazon series. D&D orcs have been moved from the Monster’s Manual to the Player’s Handbook as a playable race.

No longer are orcs savage tribes that roam the wilderness and raid civilized races for goodies and slaves. Orcs now look like Gypsies mixed with Wild West Pioneers. That obese falconer, I rest my case…

Fags Against Genocide

Leftoid (anarchist) homosexuals in Prague protested against the genocide of the Palestinians at the hands of Israel with a banner “Buzny proti genocidě”…

They also protested the fascism of Donald Trump and the closing of USAID.

This post-modern timeline is ridiculous. The people with the most sympathy for Palestinians are in the green spectrum…

The blue spectrum kinda supports the Palestinians too because they are fucking up the Jews, and lately some have expressed sympathy for university protests in support of Palestinians. But due to obvious ideological differences, they don’t join the crowd unless incognito.

Mainstream Rightoids say homos have the best rights in Israel, Tel Aviv pride, and Hamas throws fags from big story buildings. Somehow, I don’t get why a homosexual should support the displacement of Arabs by the Jewish settler state only because the latter has progressed further on gay rights.

Like honestly, I support Russia and have my money in BlackRock shares. Quite frankly, if I was a BlackRock patriot, I would support the Ukrainian oligarchy, the global oligarchy… who wants to loot both Ukraine and Russia. Does it mean I would like to live in Russia? No fucking way but I think the Russians are right in defending their own interests.

Many globohomo media drones are supporting Ukraine. Check out my collection of NAFOtards, recently updated. These people have various motivations, many believe Ukraine is a victim of aggression just like Fags for Palestine, many are also gay.

Sid Meier’s Civilization VII is a Simulation of a Civ Game

Don’t buy it!

Harriet Tubman, some people say she is a token negro, and this woke pandering but I really did not care…

Dear readers, I had the honor to play Civilization VII for the past three nights, and I am sorely disappointed. The game feels like a simulation of a Civilization game rather than a real Civ…

The game introduces a new mechanic of changing ages. And with an age you change a civilization. So, I was playing in the ancient age, as the Romans, led by Harriet Tubman. 😆 And suddenly, I managed to make it to the exploration age, where I chose the Spanish.

One moment in the game I had Roman legions, suddenly the scenery changed, and I had Spanish tercios armed with muskets and halberds. I was literally transported from 1 AD to the 1500. I have nothing against the idea of ages, and changing of civilization. But I expected the change to be gradual, I expected to be faced with a crisis. I expected my old age units to be retained and I would have to spend money to upgrade them. Upgrading units as in other Civ games seems not implemented. You cannot upgrade early game warriors to legionnaires.

Also, units don’t seem to be linked to resources. I must say I was spamming legions like there was no tomorrow. I have not researched gunpowder or developed related resources but I had a number of tercios. So I gathered them and went on to conquer a city. The musket and halberd armed tercios were weak against a swordsman. Luckily I took the city because I overwhelmed my opponent with units. Yesterday I tried to take one of those neutral settlements and I walked in and did not take it over.

In this game you kinda never know if you are doing something wrong or the game is glitched. The game held rather steady, I did not experience any crashes but I had several animation glitches when units are attacking.

Overall, I must say I am glad I did not pay for it, and played it from my relative’s Steam library. I have actually bought only two games recently, that is Space Marine II and Baldur’s Gate III. I will not be turning Civ VII on for now. Maybe if they get to work and present a very different game several months from now, I might give it a go.

Fuck EVs in 2025

This is post that will sum up my post disparaging electric vehicles…

Personally, I would not even be so anal about electric vehicles if the EU did not want to ban combustion engine by 2035, and there wasn’t a sense of hopelessness that we cannot do anything about it. Politicians cannot be trusted, and those that can don’t have enough support. It is fucked up, and hopefully forces that want to keep the combustion engine for the people to exploit will win in the end.

EVs are an evolutionary dead end. Tesla looks high tech, and those Chinese EVs seem to be quite neat but combustion engine is still superior. Batteries make trucks heavy, I am sorry but they need to have a diesel engine. I am all for hybrids, they seem to make consumption of diesel fuel more efficient, and I am for diesel fuel made from sources other than oil. I wonder how much diesel a society can generate from cooking oil, and other biological material? Imagine households could sell this shit to diesel refineries powered by nuclear reactors. I could even have a bio-reactor to make basic materials in my garden.

Rudolf Diesel gave humanity the diesel engine, Richarda Lang will take it away…

EVs don’t like very low or very high temperatures. They are simply shit cars. We need good reliable gear on not some ideologically propped garbage.

Solar panels don’t interest me, we don’t even have a sun in this part of the world. I give some chances to geothermal and I am totally bullish on nuclear. We need those nuclear reactors built ASAP. Windmills need to be discarded and anyone building them shamed.

Czechia Should Leave NATO ASAP

Czech normies normally flip out at this suggestion. This is a very unpopular opinion here in Czechia but I will voice it anyway…

NATO is going to cost us. Donald Trump wants an alliance. He does not want America to be our daddy. He wants defense partners that would spend on defense like Murica does. Presumably buying American weapons systems, and making America rich. Trump wants 5% of GDP to be spent on defense. The Czech minister for European affairs…

We have a minister for European Affairs

…says we can increase defense spending by increasing taxes. And my friends, I don’t want parasites like this minister to be advocating for bigger taxes. I want lower taxes, and a thinner state. No useless ministers, and no large military budgets.

If you look at neighboring countries like Austria, or Switzerland (Switzerland is like 5 hour drive from here), both of which are not in NATO, have very low defense budgets. Austria 0.84%, and Switzerland 0.70%. Somehow they don’t need NATO for defense, even the recent invasion of Ukraine didn’t make them join, unlike Scandinavia. For some reason they are not afraid of Putin.

Source

More NATO spending will mean less money for healthcare and education. There is no free college or healthcare in the US. While I am on of those that thinks this sector ought to be more privatized but there needs to some government involvement as this is imperative for maintaining high level of human capital needed for development.

Supporters of NATO are telling us that if we get out of there, we will need to spend more on defense. Like 26% of GDP as did Czechoslovakia in the interwar period. But Czechoslovakia was literally surrounded on all sides by hostile states with territorial pretensions. Czechia doesn’t have this problem. So we either have a choice, be a worthy ally to Murica or decide our own defense policy.

Do Ukrainians Want War?

Tara’s Kuzio has correctly noted that the Russian public only has a positive view of Ukraine when the latter has a pro-Russian government…

My question is why should the Russians tolerate anti-Russian governments on their borders? Would the United States tolerate anti-American neighbors? Ask Cuba! It is my contention that Ukraine never had a pro-Russian government. No Ukrainian government was ever able to make the Russian language second official despite the Russian language being spoken by over 70% of the population.

In fact if you look, the Russians had a problem with explicitly anti-Russian governments that followed Western sponsored color revolutions in 2004 and 2013. These shifts ment attacks on Russian language, attacks on the Orthodox Church, suppression of political forces accused of pro-Russianness, Russophobia in the media, extrajudicial killings of individuals not content with this state of affairs, glorification of Nazi collaboration, Neonazism, the burning of people in Odessa, and all out war in the Donbas.

Supporters of Ukraine would like you to believe that this is all Russia’s fault, and was all done by the arch-devil, Igor Girkin. They are completely oblivious to the fact that only a minority of people in Donetsk liked Ukraine and Ukrainian Nazis. Usually the wealthier did, the rest of the population did not. What is wrong with Russia lending support to these people? Should Russia just stand and watch how Azov Nazis roll over them with tanks? Sorry dude, in which world do you live in?

Follow this link to see what the people of Donetsk thought about Neonazis that came to their city. I wonder how many of the latter escaped alive.

How did the Ukrainians assert their “independence”?

Ukrainian discourse is based on profound mystification. Ukraine was independent since 1991. Russia accepted this independence but this independence was not enough for some people. Some people wanted a war. Children jumping screaming “Hang the Muscovite” is African level political performance. Russia is determined to kill them all before they grow. I am sorry, this is not me saying it.

Denazification is genocide my friends, Russia will kill them all. Killing Nazis that want to kill you is wrong and Russia is the asshole aggressor. Russia should allow the Nazis to kill Russians, or the West will implement punitive measures, sanctions, embargoes, pressure against Russia’s trading partners, exclusion from sporting events, and they will give weapons to Ukrainian Nazis to kill the Russians better because they are killing orcs. This is Warhammer and the Ukrainians are dwarves killing orcs because of a grudge.

Cirilla Has Hit the Wall

CD Projekt Red wants to go with the times. They want a female boss babe Mary Sue protagonist. They don’t have to go far, Gen X simps, fat nerds like Sapkowski and G.R.R Martin, usually write those into their books. They have these fantasies from a lack of quality pussy in their lives.

Mothefucka, I wanna play as a badass mutant hunk, who smashes hot sorceresses. What is this shit? Matter of fact, why don’t you give the players a choice. Two different playthroughs, two experiences. Female and male? These days. I cannot buy games without seeing the gameplay, without seeing people playing it, people enjoying it, people showing cool experience online.

As I get older, I have other interests and I don’t play games that much, so it better be good…