For those who brought up Kissinger, I wonder if they knew Kissinger actually changed his stance and proposed US to be on good terms with Russia and go against China? I mean, he is against Russia and China from getting close with each other, and his foreign policies are based entirely on such concept. Folks don’t pay attention, that’s the problem.
Well, to think about it, Kissinger simply took advantage of the tension between China and USSR. Kissinger simply approached China and offered a gesture of friendship. There were a few goals in mind:
—As the middle-class in US and Europe were fed up with 50’s ultra-conservative societal values, Civil Rights movement and sexual revolution happened in the 60’s. According to my middle-class termination theory, that was when US decided to take full advantage of East Asia by introducing immigrants from South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan as an attempt to rebalance the racial relationship
—As US realized how maintaining a large middle-class population means trouble, US was already planning on sourcing jobs to East Asia. Of course, this was just the beginning of many things. According to my theory, a lot of shit we’re seeing today were originated from then. The end goal was simple: to kill off all the middle-class across US and eventually, Europe.
—Also, US was already thinking about transferring jobs oversea. They’ve seen how economic of many East Asian countries were growing menacingly at that time and were making preparation. They figured it would be best to transfer more jobs to China, so none of them would surpass US in terms of economic growth (Japan almost did, which enraged US back in the 80s. You should see Trump’s comment on Japan back then). Of course, when it comes to this type of things, they tend to do it secretly. The last thing they want would be a mass awakening of East Asians. East Asians in general are less aware of things such as power dynamic and social dynamic outside of our circles, as many of our way of thinking are simply too inward…we weren’t always that bad, based on the historical evidence suggested, but history lesson aside, US intends to keep it that way. It was like that when MacArthur killed off any thoughts of reforming after the end of WW2, and in many ways, it’s still like that…just with more sexual shits.
—Then of course, if US could lure the weaker ones to its side, it would severely damage the stronger one. Back then, China was significantly weaker than USSR, and combined with Mao’s autism streaks at the time, Kissinger viewed China as the prime target for luring
From the looks of things, Kissinger wants to repeat the pattern as of late. He wants US to be cool with Russia to fuck over China. But the same trick won’t work twice. Russia is free to trade or befriend with whoever it wants; and outside of East Asia, US is no longer as influential as it was back then.
Now, back to the topic. Those who favors Ukraine + Israel + China…that ain’t no Kissinger, at least not the 2010s Kissinger. That shit sounds like some dorky Jewish dude with Asian fetishism. Think of Zucki the Suka aka zucc for example. Either way, it’s someone I’d love to hit him in the balls. However, most normies are politically illiterate. They simply don’t get it.
Insomniac Resurrected 
For those who brought up Kissinger, I wonder if they knew Kissinger actually changed his stance and proposed US to be on good terms with Russia and go against China? I mean, he is against Russia and China from getting close with each other, and his foreign policies are based entirely on such concept. Folks don’t pay attention, that’s the problem.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wasn’t the strategy to cause a rift between China and the USSR?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, to think about it, Kissinger simply took advantage of the tension between China and USSR. Kissinger simply approached China and offered a gesture of friendship. There were a few goals in mind:
—As the middle-class in US and Europe were fed up with 50’s ultra-conservative societal values, Civil Rights movement and sexual revolution happened in the 60’s. According to my middle-class termination theory, that was when US decided to take full advantage of East Asia by introducing immigrants from South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan as an attempt to rebalance the racial relationship
—As US realized how maintaining a large middle-class population means trouble, US was already planning on sourcing jobs to East Asia. Of course, this was just the beginning of many things. According to my theory, a lot of shit we’re seeing today were originated from then. The end goal was simple: to kill off all the middle-class across US and eventually, Europe.
—Also, US was already thinking about transferring jobs oversea. They’ve seen how economic of many East Asian countries were growing menacingly at that time and were making preparation. They figured it would be best to transfer more jobs to China, so none of them would surpass US in terms of economic growth (Japan almost did, which enraged US back in the 80s. You should see Trump’s comment on Japan back then). Of course, when it comes to this type of things, they tend to do it secretly. The last thing they want would be a mass awakening of East Asians. East Asians in general are less aware of things such as power dynamic and social dynamic outside of our circles, as many of our way of thinking are simply too inward…we weren’t always that bad, based on the historical evidence suggested, but history lesson aside, US intends to keep it that way. It was like that when MacArthur killed off any thoughts of reforming after the end of WW2, and in many ways, it’s still like that…just with more sexual shits.
—Then of course, if US could lure the weaker ones to its side, it would severely damage the stronger one. Back then, China was significantly weaker than USSR, and combined with Mao’s autism streaks at the time, Kissinger viewed China as the prime target for luring
From the looks of things, Kissinger wants to repeat the pattern as of late. He wants US to be cool with Russia to fuck over China. But the same trick won’t work twice. Russia is free to trade or befriend with whoever it wants; and outside of East Asia, US is no longer as influential as it was back then.
Now, back to the topic. Those who favors Ukraine + Israel + China…that ain’t no Kissinger, at least not the 2010s Kissinger. That shit sounds like some dorky Jewish dude with Asian fetishism. Think of Zucki the Suka aka zucc for example. Either way, it’s someone I’d love to hit him in the balls. However, most normies are politically illiterate. They simply don’t get it.
LikeLiked by 1 person