For a long time I have thought about how to tackle this topic. The topic of shysters preying on lonely men, trying to sell them their mediocre products for a lump sum of money has a long history and is quite varied…
There are now many female “dating coaches” (aka roaches) because while female loneliness is not as acute as male but it is growing and with it the audience of some enterprising hoes…
I don’t watch that shit regularly but from time to time I listen to what they fill the heads of young women with. I cannot make a good summary of their content. I would say it is more feel good shit but soyboy shit like Destiny is also geared at men.
I have observed several shyster tactics the dating roaches use:
1) They all promote some stupid and often borderline harmful activity. Mostly the classic PUA shit of pursuing women, which is a quick way towards catching herpes, or being accused of being a creep. Freaks such as the the Raw Eggs Nationalist or the Liver King were consuming uncooked eggs and raw liver on camera telling us that this is the quickest way to achieve a muscular physique. In the case of the Liver King it turned out he is on steroids.
This is when we are coming to body building as a way to win favour with women. This in my opinion is one of the stupidest trade offs there is out there. You fuck up your metabolism, risk injury, and all this for modern skanks. This is not to say I am against exercise, you don’t wanna be obese, that’s just as bad as being Zyzz. Being an athlete can definitely help you get with the chicks but rather than looks, you are playing the status and money game here.
Some channels out there promote passport broing, aka sex tourism from Western countries to places like South East Asia or Latin America. I am not against slamming non-white women or traveling to far away destinations to get your dick wet. I have done it myself. Although, these days if a chick is not up for a coffee in the town center after work, I cannot be bothered. The problem with these channels is they make things seem better than they really are. I don’t think women in South East Asia are more traditional than women in Europe. These places have been equally hit by modernity, they are just poorer. And really, you are just exploiting your financial prowess here, maybe if you are white also looks.
There is a video out there of Andrew Tate suggesting men should date trannies. He asked: “Would you rather fuck Hulk Hogan with a pussy or Megan Fox with a dick?” Both of that shit sounds fucking gay…
2) They either shame their audience or don’t tell your audience the truth. Shaming is very common practice among the roaches. It is a psychological manipulation where they are trying to provoke anxiety in their viewers about being inadequate. Feelings of inadequacy is there to help sell shit to frustrated teenagers whose hormones are raging. You will see these twats shaming men for playing video games. You know who else shames men for being into video games, the women. Roaches pander to female worldview all the time.
I have a mildly physical job, I walk 5 kilometers every day at work. So when I get home, all I want it to put my legs on the table, count some astrology, and immerse myself in some video game, reach level 30 and kill that nasty vampire. And no shyster on the internet will tell me I am doing something wrong. Obviously, excessive gameplay can be detrimental and you ought to dedicate you time to better pursuits but seriously, you also need to entertain yourself.
There was one freak on YouTube that went by the name Tribe of Men, and then when the latter got deleted the League of Men, who literally shamed his audience for having dirty underwear. Andrew Tate shamed his viewers for being brokies, although he literally made his money on harvesting simpbucks through cam girls. He even admitted to writing messages to the simps himself on behalf of the girls.
The credentials of Andrew Tate:
3) They all sell some mediocre and questionable product. Often some shitty PUA course, personal relationship coaching, or some book. If you have nothing else to read, you might give some of that shit a go but I consider time to be precious. They often mix in business advice but usually none of it is anything super special that will make you prosper, and usually you can find the same advice for free in YouTube videos or elsewhere.
Andrew Tate charged $50 monthly for his Hustler’s University. He used this marketing trick where it said the fee is reduced from $100. Although this FOMO inducing offer is said to be limited, it was hanging there for several months. Somebody actually leaked Andrew Tate’s lecture to YouTube and I listened to it while counting astrology. If you want to spend $50 on Andrew Tate chatting shit, you are welcome.
One interesting insight however, that Andrew Tate had in that talk was never to sell your product cheap. And I guess another roach took it to heart. Below is Hamza Ahmed, a gym freak that had a YouTube channel. He had this gig called Adonis University, where he charges $500 for a course. With $100 additional monthly fee. Information (absolutely follow this link) has it, Hamza made hundreds of thousands on this grift. That means hundreds to a thousand of suckers have subscribed to his course.
4) Few of these freaks have anything to show for their efforts. You see Hamza above? I was pulling chicks like that when I was 14 and they let me play with their titties. I don’t know what is high quality at her. Is this all this roach could pull for his efforts?
Many of these guys are living examples of why what they are preaching should not be followed by anyone. The PUAs hunting easy girls often have STDs. Herpes is free and it is forever. Many of these fools burn out of this lifestyle. Remember Roosh V? He is now an overgrown hermit that talks about Orthodox Christianity. Same with Andrew Tate, who is talking about Islam now. It makes you wonder if he still manages his cam girl business, as that is absolute haram? Andrew Tate is in a bit of trouble with the Romanian authorities over his hoe pimping, and while I think he is innocent, the powers that be will use the women you associate with to destroy you.
5) They almost ubiquitously hate the MGTOW. PUAs are like incels, they hate anyone that doesn’t obsess with pussy. They cannot imagine there are guys who have dated and married modern women and can be so jaded by all this they swear off women altogether, even though unlike incel rejects they are eligible bachelors. For PUAs, MGTOW is messing with their bottom line, which are frustrated incels and blue pill simps that seek the help of dating gurus because dating modern women is hard. MGTOW tells men that the juice is not worth the squeeze and you are better off going your own way without having your worth as a man defined by women.
Insomniac Resurrected 
For Andrew Tate, I’ve already figured him out after watching like two of his shit (I’m smart enough not to pay though). I may have told you before, but yes, that guy is basically recycling some age old shit from manosphere and bring it to TikTok and gained money and fame. Those of us who’re in touch with manosphere or even just have enough life experience know perfectly about what he’s trying to say about women.
That said, Tate’s kind of a survivor in modernity in a more self-serving way. Basically, his outlooks can be summarized into this: “look, I don’t claim to know how to fix today’s women. But I know one thing, which is to survive and even thrive on this shit. I’ll just portray some basic knowledge about today’s women and what they want that anyone who has ever shagged a woman knows without coming up with ways to fix them, and tell men to go along with that image and for the sake of my pocket, I’ll charge these dumb ass men some sweet sweet cash”. It’s simple as that. I look at him as a survivor, even though I don’t support him. That is until he got fucked over in Romania. Being careless come with a price.
Now, for his actual messages, I’d say it’s the fastest way to get a man locked in prison like himself. That said, I came to a thought…if all of us are MGTOW, then who’s going to have kids so we can actually clean up the female populations through better parented females? My initial thought after it is to encourage lab babies around the world. Just set up gigantic nursery centers to raise babies by highly trained professionals instead of actual biological or adoptive parents, and it may reduce the chances of child abuse or improper parenting altogether, which may reduce the chances of emotional scars and mental disorder on top of the type of women we all know too much about. It sounds kinda like a pleasant idea, but at the end, who’s going to pay the taxes to maintain these nursery centers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am actually supporting Andrew Tate in his struggle against the Romanian state. Women and the state should not have the power to jail a man like this.
As for MGTOW and reproduction, guys like Barbarossa and Undead Chronic on YouTube advocated surrogacy. This way, a short Indian IT nerd could have a child with a 6 ft. tall blond Swedish girl. 😂 There is however the problem of gynocentric society not even allowing single men to adopt. Surrogate mothers could however campaign on feminist grounds like sex workers. Quite frankly, Napoleon had 10 siblings. Imagine a woman making like 50-100 k per child or even more. The appearance of the artificial womb would democratize this process.
Many guys are not MGTOW because they want to but because they cannot find a worthwhile mate to form a family with. Not only are many guys unattractive to women, and modern women don’t even need them. But a lot of guys out there who strike with the ladies find out that the juice is not worth the squeeze. I think the surrogacy and artificial wombs will be introduced in response eventually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For Tate’s case against Romanian state, I’m not talking just about the case. This is the way how I see it: if you read into Tate’s messages, you can see he has reached the same type of understanding that most within manosphere have; there’s a drastic increasing of women who love that lowlife shit from men. It’s bigger than Tate’s pimping business.
I mean, women don’t just wanna submit themselves to pimps. It’s just one of the things they do. They would cheer when they see a man rob a corner store, mug some random old person or international student on the street, or bullying someone to depression or suicidal or shoot someone. These women confuse acts of cruelty and mindlessly violence and aggression with “wits” and “dominance” and deep down inside, they just want a wild ass gangsta who probably has felony record to take them out to a wild ride due to being bored and that ever-so-sensical middle-class upbringings and they believe those men will never unleash their practice onto them and will only be violent and aggressive for them. I believe you can clearly see where this is heading to…the amounts of men who’re bullied, beaten, persecuted or murdered as well as the amounts of men who get locked behind bars will only increase.
Now, Tate seems to suggest men to just go with the flow and be as big of an asshole as possible, while I suggest parents to do a better job at raising their daughters and men should go MGTOW until we see a significant sign of improvement. This is where me and Tate differs. I respect him for getting his money and fame, but not his messages.
Now, as for surrogacy, how about this? The main problem is with parenting and how parents don’t know how to raise kids anymore rather than the process of direct pregnancy itself; let’s face it, if we just let parents to raise kids as they wish using either the tradcon methods or today’s liberalism, gender relationship will get even worse, and societies overall will become even more vicious. We need something in place to sort out the future generations so a more desirable style of childbearing and parenting will actually work.
In another word, surrogacy and artificial wombs will only be a temporary solution, so is the gigantic nursery centers I’ve also proposed. Surrogacy should be regulated in order to keep the gynocentric and ethnocentric crowds happy, and it should if you take East Asian bitches’ ever-so-good common sense into consideration. BUT here’s the deal: the artificial wombs will have to be accompanied with the nursery centers, where kids will be raised by trained professionals instead of biological or adoptive parents. And this nursery centers will teach kids how to read, write, do basic mathematic while focusing on actual skillsets and personality development such as finding interests (as opposed to school’s curriculum and forced social activities) and most of all, sense of responsibility that’s based on real life instead of the pretention provided by schools or some sorts of forced disciplinary that’s never practical to begin with. That way, schools and traditional parents will be removed completely and there will only be STEM schools for advanced stuffs and tech schools for vocational training. This will reduce the spending on primary and secondary schools and hopefully, lower the taxes required to keep such operations functional.
And of course, like I said, it’s only a temporary solution. The goal is to create a generation who will be free of today’s bullshit. Once there’s a drastic improvement and tons of laws have been reformed to prevent women from shaping men into fuckups or greaze over men, none of those will be needed anymore (for the ones who’re mad about the potential rise in taxes, it may be a relief). The only problem here, would be how to create a better narrative that people can buy into. I mean, you won’t reach the desired result or even get it rolling without people’s understanding and supports.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know, I believe women do not like the men too much. So raising them in a certain way will only go as far as remedying the situation. Bottom line is that in my opinion, the majority of relationships are in some way dysfunctional. 50% of marriages end in divorce, some 30% of marriages are sexless. In many couples you see the woman bossing over the beta male husband. Women will be nagging over trivial bullshit and will even end the relationship over some stupidity. It would require some serious education but in our current gynocentric reality that education will be dismissed as misogyny. Telling women anything uncomfortable is misogyny today. I think we should actually embrace female empowerment, and all those “I don’t need no man” strong and independent ladies. At the end of the day, would you like any of these women to make life miserable for some poor sod that performs the role of a husband?
LikeLike
“It would require some serious education” hence why I was talking about raising them in a certain way. What you talk about is a phenomenon, and what I like to talk about is the root of this phenomenon and figure out a way to stop it without that whole fatalistic outlook of “it’s all doomed” and “I simply don’t care if I’m hurt anymore. I just want them to suffer as much as possible, even if it makes it inconvenient for myself.” or “just let them self-destruct. Actually, I’ll add fuel to the fire and make them destroy themselves even more”. I find such type of attitudes a bit irrational and melodramatic. Ok…for the last one, I may go along with such type of approach if it serves some strategic purpose, but other than that, I usually don’t. I like to do things for an objective rather than just to dish out punishment. More often than not, punishment is just a way for someone to express their anger rather than solving a problem. No matter how you go about it, punishment is always very emotional in nature. I’m not discouraging the act of punishing someone, as we all human after all. But I don’t think anyone should focus more than necessary on it if the person wants to solve a problem. If you want me to go further, part of the reasons why today’s politics within US and EU, and geopolitical situation in East Asia are all such a mess, is because we got way too many people with that punitive attitude about things.
It may appear that women hate men, but it wasn’t always like this. And if you actually look at the matters in a broader sense, you’ll realize one thing; the more possessive the society is to women and children, the more complex people tend to have; plenty of men have complex under that condition too, but for women, they become especially weird. That said, you’re basically opening up the pandora’s box by encouraging the type of shit the contemporary liberalism advocates. You wonder why so many East Asian women are a bit…off? So the conclusion? We can’t resort to that 1950s way of going about things, but by encouraging liberalism is also not a way to go. Half of it is caused by the possessive and restricting element of traditional upbringing (sometimes it gets so bad that it’s almost abusive), another half of it is caused by lack of responsibility. In a middle-class upbringing, both of which are heavily presented. You wonder why middle-class are the most likely ones to be radical feminist, or to daydream about the hood shit? Personally, I’m all about giving it a try. Perhaps after a few generations, women will be fixed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am not encouraging liberalism per se because it is just the same coin only different side from traditionalism. You give women freedom but you chivalrously protect them from any responsibility. My suggestion is to return to something akin to the Victorian Era but less in the traditional sense but in a redefined modern sense, which would actually be based on objective truth and not feel good shit like modern feminism. In Victorian times like 150 years ago, the elder women would police the younger. Much of the feminism of nineteen-twenties was a rebellion of the younger lasses against the older, with the help of male simps. But my contention is that a lot of women ain’t good for relationships, and very few relationships are actually happy. My feeling is women ditched their men the soonest material means allowed them to do so. I don’t know how much feminist ideology or the sheer possibility made them do so.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As far as the relationship goes and the concept of responsibility, I’ll say it like this: if the goal is to have women cook, clean and always be by their men’s side like a little baby girl get taken to shopping by their parents, then I don’t think any woman likes it. For me, beside the looks, what I value in relationship are three things:
1. Intelligence. I consider myself sapiosexual to a degree. I’d fuck airheaded ones too, but good luck on having me settle down with one. A lot of women, especially East Asian women, confuse being a fucking dumb bitch as being cute. I can’t stand that shit! Either got something smart to say or crawl back to their mama.
2. Earthiness. I like them to be practical, down to earth and know how to prioritize their shit. They can have PhD or IQ above 150, but once I hear them shitting rainbow and unicorn out of their soft, squishy asses, I may become rather pissed. I dunno if it’s a Capricorn stellium thing with all the earth energy. You probably know more about it. But I absolutely hate it when women daydream way too much about falling in love with “violent outlaws”, “clever psychopath”…etc. Know what they’re talking about, know what helps them and what hurts them and know how to fend for themselves combined with good reasoning ability is the key. I’ve pissed off a few on r/PurplePillDebate before too for expressing my disdain of “good girls” as I hate to be the protective figure of some naive, passive aggressive ass bitch who just wanna be like some sort of autistic Princess Zelda…powerless and always want men to bail their sorry asses out YET always get fucked over by some dumb shit. That’s how I see “good girls”. I like to deal with ADULTS, but many men, even within red pill community, doesn’t see it that way. The way I see it? Those men who find little girls with kiddie ass tone and voice shouldn’t be talking shit. I may fuck them, but getting into serious relationship? Fuck no!
3. By nature, I’m not that possessive towards another human being. Coming from a highly controlling family where I literally fought my way out and I wouldn’t call it a peaceful uprising at all, I don’t like woman to be around me all the time. Shit, even without that type of parenting I had, I’d get bugged the fuck out if my girl gets that needy and might end up telling her to fuck off, as I also value my own lone time, being an introvert by nature and all. BUT it comes with a bottom line: they better not doing anything that makes me feel undignified. If they with their bitchy ass attitude wanna go to night club and tell me to stay home or just simply talking to me like I’m a fucking idiot or I’m 5, I’d be the first one to beef hard.
So no, I’m not looking for Victorian age social consensus. I mean come on, that shit is equally hard on men too. The way I see it, once we have enough down-to-earth women, a lot of things can become resolved. The problem with today’s women is that they don’t really live in reality. That shit can irk the fuck out of me, tradcon grumpy-grandma edition or modern-day feminism with all their inferiority complex alike. Women with souls of a little girl are there to be fucked for one night – I may do a really kinky treat on their bodies such as that full body tickle torture thing, and as an experienced ‘ler (or tickler), I can tickle them in the most creative way regarding the methods and area I wanna tickle, but I’ll shoo them away afterward. Meanwhile, women who actually act her age and fully attached to reality are the ones I may pay attention to, as far as relationship goes. I think it’s time for us to really reevaluate on what we consider as a good woman. This may cause a huge but much needed change in parenting tactic too if we can also reevaluate on what makes one a good son and good daughter.
LikeLike