Socialists Hate the Working Class

Something that needs to be understood about modern leftism is that the ideological basis for it was not formulated in majority by the working class. Marx never worked in the factories that he criticized. While he did have good observation of how the worker lived in his time, he did not anticipate that the capitalism will evolve. That pensions will be instituted in his native Germany, that an eight hour work day will be brought in, that holidays for the workers and facilities for recreation will be developed in the decades following the publishing of Das Kapital and the Communist Manifesto.

Communist revolutions were mostly successful in semi-developed places like Russia and China. In Czechoslovakia the Commies seized power only after the stressful and disastrous WWII. In many other East European countries the Communist regimes were imposed from above with the help of the Soviets. And many of the revolutions were military coups rather than working class uprisings. Another good examples are Castro and Che Guevara, who both came from rather privileged backgrounds and while they were successful in Cuba, Bolivian farmers had no time for Che Guevara’s antics. Pol Pot is another such example, who studied in Paris and then implemented an extreme version of what he heard there in his native Cambodia.

The working class is seen as a traitorous group especially by the intellectual left that emerges after the Great War, and is a reaction to the failure of Bolshevik revolutions in Western Europe, and the displeasure with the repressive policies of the Soviet regime. What some call Cultural Marxism shifts the focus from the working class to the presumably marginalized groups of the society like coloured people, immigrants, homosexuals, women. Strangely enough, this ideology has found supporters among the rich. Immigrants and working women cheapen the workforce. Promotion of feminism and homosexuality puts an accent on individualism. Individualism fuels consumerism.

The above meme is ridiculous but in our timeline the traditional testosterone left that did Communist revolutions in the twentieth century is very much gone. Bolshevism has pretty much failed, and the ideology is no longer attractive. But the contemporary left no longer relies on the working class or masculinity. In fact, it is rather opposed to these groups, seeing them as an obstacle to creating their utopia. Today, many people are attracted to socialist ideas because they are saddled with student loans, can’t find a job, and buying your home is off limits. This will be only exacerbated in the following years with rising prices of food and fuel, which will benefit the haves and will fall heavily on the have nots.

Socialism and Capitalism

This is in Slovakia in the Carpathians. In Communist times there was a restaurant which probably served a shitty food, and now there are shops. This is a remote place probably so the shops serve the tourists and local people. The esthetics on both buildings suck ass. Both socialism and capitalism suck ass.

South Korea on the other hand is a society of haves and have nots. They have fanatical Christians, and feminists introduced by their American occupiers. They have dismally low birthrates. And they have autistic education system. So, the system in South Korea is not morally superior to that in the North. I wouldn’t like to live in either Koreas. They both suck a big one.

Middle Class was a Psy-op

The problem I see is that work is long, works is hard, the money sucks ass, and you can afford less and less for your money every year. You cannot even increase the rent because the market sucks ass. Your savings account has an interest of 0,whatever. All the millionaires left for Dubai. If you reach a certain threshold in wealth, there is no point in remaining the resident of most places in the contemporary West.

But the post war prosperity in the West is seen as a psy-op against the Communist nations. The problem is the Bolshevik system was decrepit and notoriously inefficient in providing basic necessities for the people. And this is why the experiment failed and all the countries either became liberal democracies or authoritarian regimes with a market economy. Communist parties remained only in China and Vietnam. North Korea also introduces elements of free market.

Bolshevik style revolutions and regimes are thing of the past. Ain’t nobody got time for that. But in the West, the neoliberal system no longer makes people prosperous. It is not so much because the threat of the Communists has waned, many young people demand socialist policies, they want the gibs. It is a feature of the neoliberal system to exploit the masses in Amazon warehouse.