All of these countries are lackies of globohomo except for Rhodesia. Rhodesia was a post-colonial settler state managed by white minority in the African country known as South Rhodesia. It was opposed by black nationalists that were often propped up by the USSR. It was abandoned by the Brits and the Americans but survived due to support from apartheid South Africa and the Portuguese East Africa. When Mozambique 🇲🇿 (country with the coolest flag ever featuring AK47) declared independence, this was the end of Rhodesia.
Israel is also a settler nation created by the British but settled with Jews. I wonder, are there any publications that talk about the relationship of Britain and the Zionist movement? Actually googling Britain and Zionism yields a lot of interesting information. Israel always found far more support than Rhodesia among the countries of the West. Because obviously, the international Jewry has much more clout than some farmers in Rhodesia.
Ukrainians and Croatians are similar cases in that they are two Slavic people’s with eastern antagonists that are very similar. Serbs, Croats and Bosnian Muslims are essentially the same people but divided by religion. Ukrainians and Russians are essentially the same people divided by ideology, and to an extent religion as well. The Croatians have pretty much won their struggle against the Serbs for lebensraum. But the Croatians, unlike the Ukrainians had their own historical state for centuries, and this makes them territorially defined. The Ukrainians are a modern day invention trying to assert itself.
Finland defended itself against the USSR. My Ukrainian great grandfather was a veteran of this war. Finland lost territory and now they are salty and coping. I am not sure what their struggle is. South Korea is a bourgeois regime on Korean Peninsula which was literally bailed out by American intervention. South Korea sucks in other ways compared to North Korea, their struggle should be to pump up those birthrates.
So technically they are all ethnonationalists, bourgeois, anti-egalitarian, apartheid, discriminatory regimes that are locked in struggle against “more egalitarian” regimes. Often in service of Western imperialism.
Insomniac Resurrected 
White Rhodesians got left out because Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is not as geopolitically important. With Suez Canal, Europeans could get to Indian Ocean way faster than traveling around Africa. And also, the last thing Brits (and French for that matter) want would be for black Africans to have some sort of awakening on where they stand in the world and shift closer to USSR and China. Well, black Africans eventually shifted closer to Russia and China anyways, and Zimbabwe got sanctioned, most likely for the exact same reason…getting too close to the “big bad”. But Africa Corps still got enemies to fight in Africa, and there’s still that anti-China sentiment in some circles among Africans. I’d say on the long run, Russia and China would be able to win in Africa after series of struggles. Brits and French may get their asses handed to them even more on this matter.
Ukraine got supports because it’s a gateway between Continental Europe and Russia and a major food producer- how its internal economic is managed is another story. Then with the discovery of rare earth minerals, Trump is eyeing on it but he’s trying to do it in a way that doesn’t hurt American interest.
Israel got supports because the top dogs- mixed with Jews and Anglo by the way, want the common Jews to shut the fuck up about Hitler, hence the Brits lent them a piece of land. And not to mention much like Muslim Brotherhood, it also serves as a tool for Brits and Muricans for that matter to gain a foothold onto Middle Eastern oil. And with the rise of Baathism and Egypt’s Nasser and later on, Gaddafi’s Jamahiriya in Libya, the West wanted a counter force in Middle East and North Africa.
After USSR collapsed, the West no longer really need Yugoslavia anymore. The beef was cooking because Balkan is a strategic important location in terms of geopolitics, much like Ukraine. How it’s done? With Bosnians and Kosovo Albanians serve a more sensational purpose for media to find ways to demonize the Serbs back in the 90s, and Croatia got the support because nobody wanted to piss off Vatican on this one.
For South Koreans and Taiwanese for that matter, you’ve read enough of my posts, so you know the drama. Basically, those are just Frankenstein version of the old ways that MacArthur carved out of East Asia after WW2 and meant to stop China’s influence – not until the West gets a hold of China somehow. Because of that and perhaps the unawareness of power play behind the scenes from your average South Koreans and Taiwanese (thanks to their schools and media, which are obviously trash and in conjunct with the widespread of bullying and hazing culture, actually cancel out whatever critical thinking skill one may possess), this shit is less likely to end unless someone is willing to resort to radical methods.
Honestly, out of everyone in Europe, Finland played the safest when it comes to dealing with USSR during Cold War – for all its worth, Winter War did teach Finland a lesson on not to fuck with Russians after all. But after USSR collapsed, Finland seemed to have changed its tone – that’s opportunism in politics right there for you. Then as Russia recovered from 90s mess and became stronger, Finland got a bit nervous and jumpy and everything, and we know the rest of the events.
All in all, the countries receive that level of supports from globohomo is due to couple factors:
1. The population may have a society that’s easy to exploit – South Korea as well as Taiwan and Japan for that matter are the perfect example. Well, if East Asia doesn’t improve, then it will remain that way. Then again, if it actually improves, it will piss off a horde worth of Western nerds, lol. Word of advice to Western nerds; a. not everything has to go their ways and b. just because it doesn’t go the way they want, doesn’t mean it’s illogical, crazy or stupid.
2. There’s natural resource.
3. It’s on a strategic important location.
4. It’s used in the ever-so-old tactics of power play; the balance of power. Folks often forget that most of the time, top dogs don’t do you good out of good will. Forget what children’s books may have taught you, but usually, it’s not the case. This point is the reason why Rhodesia got fucked over, and Croatia got the supports and Bosnians and Kosovo Albanians got sympathized.
LikeLiked by 1 person