I think I wrote about this before. This new AI ascendancy will cost many their jobs. Women will be the most affected because they do stuff the AI can replace. The video above starts with copywriters training AI to replace them. 😆
Another, no less interesting sphere mentioned in the video is therapy. Therapists are some of the most dishonest individuals out there, and when they are honest they complain about women not listening, which leads fo burnouts. AI will put them out of their misery. Women would not be able to talk back to AI, or make disapproving faces.
Makes me think, if AI could act as a therapist, could it also do legal advise? Or any other consultation work? Imagine giving AI access to libraries of various kinds and all these analysts can hit the jobs office. AI could also write code, programmers will no longer be needed. Any computer task could be automated. There might be a place for humans that would check on AI, manage AI, edit the work of AI but as AI becomes more sophisticated even they would become redundant.
Sales on TikTok through AI generated content make cash without the need for a real person advertising it. Your job applications will go through AI filter removing the need for HR. Your applications will be discarded in an instance.
Insomniac Resurrected 
I think some people will always stay in coding, and similar stuff, but mostly as backup.
And scientists I guess.
Idea of AI automating everything is kinda problematic. Like what happens if AI starts glitching and everyone forgot how things work.
Or I guess people working on AI glitches and shit will be new coders.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a question of over-dependence on technology. If the machine stops, it will lead to mental clarity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I mean take for example automated truck dispatch, right now is done via phone calls, what happens when truck is sent to wrong destination. Like who takes responsibility.
Or higher stakes, if you replace flight control, and AI leads to plane crashing, currently you send a dude who made mistake to jail and politicians pretend that system is working. What with the AI, who’s responsible then? And yeah AI seems like peak reliance on tech.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It will affect more than just women’s jobs though, as today’s economic is too interconnected. Then again, the thing with AI, is that it’s a cheap replacement. It can do the job, but not necessarily doing it well. Have you seen the garbage churned out by ChatGPT or Grok? That ain’t no proper replacement! But CEOs love it, because it brings them profits – truth to be told, nobody likes working, even the CEOs. They want the mon-nay! They don’t give a fuck about the qualities of products!!
With these points, AI will face a huge backlash, but then again, it may not go that far. Because the anti-AI crowds…this shit reminds me of the anti-Beijing Chinese for real! All I see is emotionalism and “eat the rich”, just like how all I can see from anti-Beijing Chinese is “Xi is the devil, CCP bad, US is God, make China burn”…have some intellectual depth, will they? This is why I don’t feel like supporting the opposition in the case of AI or even Trump for that matter. I don’t like to support emotional losers, no matter where I go.
Well, one consists of some heartless bastards who dick ride the right-wing leaders at all costs/those “humanity needs to be destroyed because it’s filled with idiots” crowds – probably just some assholes who never get their asses whooped in their lives, and girls love that shit despite these guys trash bitches all day everyday…I really don’t get the logic behind it. And another one consists of emotional losers with their kindergarten level argument and thinking by ending Elon, everything will return to normal. I talked about the opposition, including putting one from Reddit into my hall of fame. This ain’t no 2016 nor 2017, where the lines between insanity and rationality is easy to define. There are many theories about the cause of this and I have my own, as you know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anti-AI crowds remind me of nineteenth century Luddites that opposed machines in factories. It is literally the same thing. I do not fear or oppose the AI or technological advancements. We have to cope with the disruption, not rail against it. AI is not perfect yet but Grok, while sucking at art, gives interesting answers. Text to voice AI seems quite advanced. I am sure they will figure out the various bugs eventually.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But the economic impact though. I mean, not everyone got functional families. I didn’t have functional family. Guys like us need jobs, whether we like it or not. CEOs hate their jobs, then they assume everyone can afford being jobless – at least those tech aficionados seem to think that way.
And like you said and like I tried to mention, AI can have glitches, and just overall making things pain in the ass. And Grok, honestly, it just used shit tons of phrases and slangs to make it seems authentic. That’s about it. The whole deal is just a hustle. Not every invention should be celebrated or demonized for that matter. I ain’t no Luddite. You don’t see me trashing smart phone, didn’t you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe this is my naive opinion but I believe that every invention that replaces humans liberates humans to do something else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometimes I can’t help but wonder…should we just return to the age of guild? The time when folks actually feel like doing their jobs. You wanna make it? You better got some skills or willingness to learn. Medieval Age was a shithole, no doubt. But even for shitholes, there are things we can learn from.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The guild system was abolished to liberalize the economy. Feudalism meant strict class society. And you had to be a free man of the city, and a Catholic to be a member of the guild on top of having a skill. Industrialization did away with this stratification of society, even got the nobles. Medieval economy was directly dependent on the level of technological development, once this was surpassed it was the end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The religious affiliation thing behind social class is another story. Not everything should be learned from Medieval Age. But like I said, even shitholes got a thing or two to learn from.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are also paces too. It’s easy for you to say “it’s darwinism at work” when you’re sitting behind the desk and not the ones who’s catching the heats. But in all reality, for every human being who got “liberated”, there’s that guy who got fucked over. That’s why social responsibilities matter. The reason why folks reject social responsibilities is simple actually; the ones who talk about it today, I mean today, are bunch of fucktards who talk out of their asses. Lack of proper parenting, college and social media is to blame. And I haven’t even started on what “other things” humanities are doing upon being liberated.
LikeLiked by 1 person